![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , C J Campbell wrote:
Fine, if you have a huge corporation that can afford a bunch of well-paid admins. Your argument is beginning to sound an awful lot like you don't think most people should have computers and that you think that the general public is a menace. No, I think Windows as it currently stands is unsuitable for the general public. Windows as it stands is fine in an environment where a corporate admin can look after the network. It's not the users fault, it's the fault of Microsoft because the configuration is insecure by default. Windows as it stands should have at least the software firewall on *by default* and almost all services (most services which home users will never use) *off* by default. Finally, MS has decided to listen and will have the firewall on by default in Service Pack 2. Security researchers have been saying this for *years*, and only now is it being done. In this instance, Windows 98 is better than Windows XP. The real problems didn't start happening until XP came out. Windows XP was a retrograde step for home users on the internet - it just allowed them to be 0wn3d because of all the additional potentially exploitable (and as it happens, actually exploitable) services that were running. It's not a problem with the users. It's entirely a problem with Windows. The users are essentially decieved - it's a nice easy to set up system, but they've been tricked into having a system that claims to be easy to use and maintain, but really requires an expert system administrator to make secure. That isn't the fault of Windows. But it IS the fault of Windows. Having a number of insecure services turned on by default which the vast majority of home users will *never* use on a network is purely the fault of Microsoft. The PC manufacturers also have some responsibility to bear - they could have at least thought about it and set up a reasonably secure disk image when they duplicated the hard disk loads for their PCs. In any case, the Macintosh has been easy to set up since the 1980s (including setting up a Mac LAN) so ease-of-use is hardly a Microsoft innovation. It's just a pity that the hardware platform wasn't open. might start asking yourself what would happen if you really got your way. Maybe you are a bigger threat than the public you despise. Gosh, you're reading an awful lot into my post that I didn't write. I don't think I've seen a non-sequitur like that since Lord Tebbit managed to turn a radio interview on obesity into how the Government was encouraging buggery! -- Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net "Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Glass Goose Website revamped | wingsnaprop | Home Built | 0 | December 14th 04 02:58 PM |
Glass cockpits & Turn Coordinators | Jeremy Lew | Piloting | 2 | May 29th 04 06:16 AM |
Glass Cockpit in Older Planes | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 2 | May 20th 04 01:20 AM |
C182 Glass Panel | Scott Schluer | Piloting | 15 | February 27th 04 03:52 PM |
Lesson in Glass | JimC | Owning | 3 | August 6th 03 01:09 AM |