![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mis-rigging could happen to any type. A school teacher was killed in Wales
one day while I was soaring due to mis-rigging one of the ruddervator control guides on his v-tailed BG-135, diving in from the top of the winch launch (his second of the day). It was only the second occasion he'd rigged the glider IIRC. Could have been a t-tail. I flew a v-tailed SHK for four years. The rigging of the control guides was very similar and held the same potential for being mis-rigged as the aforementioned BG-135. The sad part is that the guide is clearly in view during control deflection. This is one very specific instance where a PCC might not have detected the problem, but a visual inspection would. The fact that he made the first flight successfully attests to this. The actual disconnect probably happened during ground handling or during he landing role and wasn't noticed before the second flight. Frank Whiteley "Mark James Boyd" wrote in message news:41818446$1@darkstar... This is the only fatality I am aware of at Avenal, and the only ruddervator mechanism-related T-tail fatality I have read. NTSB Identification: LAX92LA393 . The docket is stored on NTSB microfiche number 48074. 14 CFR Part 91: General Aviation Accident occurred Friday, September 18, 1992 in AVENAL, CA Probable Cause Approval Date: 9/14/1993 Aircraft: SPARKS-SCHREDER HP-140V, registration: N704B Injuries: 1 Fatal. Prob cause: " THE LOSS OF PITCH AND YAW CONTROL DUE TO THE SEPARATION OF THE RUDDERVATOR CONTROL CABLE FROM ITS CLEVIS FORK DUE TO IMPROPER INSTALLATION." In article , Peter Wyld wrote: At 08:54 28 October 2004, Marian_Aldenhövel wrote: Hi, Thank you all, I have learned a lot. I have also come up with two more things to consider, both rather minor I suspect: - The control linkages are propably more complicated in a T-Tail (con). - With a T-Tail you can build the elevator in one piece so you can rig and derig more easily (pro). Now why are we not seeing more V-Tails? The main pro for T-Tails seem to be: - Good ground clearance - Less drag - Operates in clean undisturbed air How does a V-Tail stand up against that? Complicated mixing box required for elevator/rudder control. -- ------------+ Mark J. Boyd |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tail Skid Help / Advice | Ray Lovinggood | Soaring | 3 | January 2nd 04 08:16 PM |
AH64 tail rotor | CivetOne | Rotorcraft | 3 | October 23rd 03 07:18 PM |
Oshkosh Get together Roster - Sign in, please! | Bruce E. Butts | Owning | 1 | July 26th 03 11:34 AM |
Oshkosh Get together Roster - Sign in, please! | Bruce E. Butts | Piloting | 1 | July 26th 03 11:34 AM |
The prone postion for tail gunners versus turrets. | The Enlightenment | Military Aviation | 8 | July 22nd 03 11:01 PM |