![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... "Frank Ch. Eigler" wrote in message ... "Matt Barrow" writes: "Icebound" wrote: [...] If the altimeter setting came from a station in the valley 5000 feet in true height below the aircraft, the indicated height could differ from true height by as much as 1500 feet feet. If it came from a station on the hill only 1000 feet in true height from the aircraft, the difference is likely less than 300 feet. [...] Mind telling me how that variation (of that magnitude) could come about? If you run through the full "true altitude" calculation discussed during early ground school, you'll see that there is a term that relates to the elevation of the measurement station. The effect is that the lower you are AGL, the closer the calibrated & true altitudes tend to become, because deviations from the standard atmosphere become less significant within less tall columns of air. Ground stations are all AT GROUND LEVEL, whether the station is at 2000 MSL or 6000 MSL. Ground stations are all more or less at ground level. But they report their altimeter settings in terms of Mean Sea Level, in order to provide a common basis of comparison. This means that the air pressure read from the station's barometer must be *corrected* to sea level. The correction is in terms of the conditions of the ICAO standard atmosphere, taking account the difference in elevation from MSL only: i.e. temperature, humidity etc. or other local differences in the composition of the atmosphere are not considered in this correction. An altimeter can be expected to indicate the correct altitude (+/- 75') only on the ground at the given ground station, and elsewhere, only where ICAO standard conditions prevail. For any other position or condition the altimeter can be expected to be in error (and the atmosphere can be expected to always differ from the ICAO standard conditions). For positions directly above or below the given station, the amount of error can be expected to be roughly proportional to the difference between the actual altitude and the station elevation. Thus, for a flight at 5000 feet, the altimeter setting for a (nearby) ground station at 5000 feet elevation can be expected to indicate closer to true altitude than when using the altimieter setting for a station at sea level. For a flight nearer sea level, the setting from the (nearby) sea level station will indicate closer to the true altitude than the altimeter setting for the 5000' station. In either case, there can be expected to be other errors due to the lateral distance to the station as well, and the difference in atmospheric conditions that this entails. The desire to minimize these effects is why we generally choose the altimeter setting from the nearest ground station, or otherwise nearest to our route of flight. And why, in the point under discussion, a nearby ground station located nearer to our actual altitude is better than one at a different elevation. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pressure Altitude and Terminology | Icebound | Piloting | 0 | November 27th 04 09:14 PM |
Local altimeter at BFM | Dan Luke | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | June 15th 04 02:01 PM |
Why not use the F-22 to replace the F/A-18 and F-14? | Tony | Naval Aviation | 290 | March 7th 04 07:58 PM |
Why not use the F-22 to replace the F/A-18 and F-14? | Guy Alcala | Military Aviation | 265 | March 7th 04 09:28 AM |
Altimeter experience | HankC | Piloting | 2 | July 25th 03 09:43 PM |