![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Standard disclaimer applies: I still have my copy of Flight Training
next to the porcelain throne. Ahem. However, as I flip the pages of this magazine, I cannot help but think that companies like Garmin are getting off a bit easy. Being a software developer, I am very suprised to discover that not every aicraft costing over $30,000 has a full-featured glass cockpit. Unless I am missing somethnig, it appears that everything that a pilot needs can be made with very very cheap hardware. A PC can be had for under $500 easily, the mother board for even less. There are software programmable radios that can be made for under $100 that can tune into any frequency under 1GHz (in other words, if it's there and not encrypted, you can get it). There are USB sensors of all sorts (altitude, humidity, wind speed, etc.) And good software engineers can write pretty much any piece of software that is required so long as they receive guidance about what is supposed to do what, with pictures of twirly things to on the display to keep the pilot from getting bored. So I am wondering, why isn't anyone doing this on a grander scale. Are they? There is nothing wrong with PC hardware as long as its rugged enough to pass environmental qualification. The problem is that you can't put Windows on any glass cockpit display that is used for primary flight instruments. The reason you can't is that you won't be able to comply with the FAA approved software development process objectives. Moving maps and other multifunction displays do commonly use industrial PC motherboards and Windows. You can go build your own plane and twiddle with Windows all you want. Or you can use a PC as long as its not permanently installed in the plane. You may be a software developer but you apparently don't have any experience in embedded high reliability systems. High reliability is not measured in Mean Time Between Windows Reboot. High development costs due to a rigorous development process plus small market size equals high prices per unit. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Make Thousands of Dollars easily!!!! | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | June 1st 05 04:15 AM |
millionaire on the Internet... in weeks! | Malcolm Austin | Soaring | 0 | November 5th 04 11:14 PM |
Lesson in Glass | JimC | Owning | 3 | August 6th 03 01:09 AM |