![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 05 Jul 2005 00:43:08 -0400, Joe Camp wrote:
"Any of their free time"? Like, if I take 10 seconds out of my busy day and pick up a piece of trash at the entry point, I should get free admission? I can see EAA's logic. If they gave free admission for the current show, it's quite possible that they'd have problems having enough volunteers towards the end of the week. There'd be some of folks putting in 20 hours or so on the setup weekend, then not doing anything at all during the main part of the show 'cause they already got their free ride. Seems like their policy is aimed the right way; getting a group of folks who come back and volunteer in later years. Volunteer in 2005, put your 20 hours in, get free admission in 2006. Come in free in 2006, and while you're there anyway, put in a couple hours per day volunteering so you can get free admission the year after that, too. None of these shows are possible without the volunteer cadre. I think EAA knows that if they seriously start shafting them, the Board of Directors will be out picking up trash themselves. :-) I guess some of us value our free time more than others. I certainly agree... which is why you don't often find me volunteering. I have great respect for those who do, though. I've had free admission most of my trips there, anyway. Those time that I haven't, I don't consider the admission fees onerous. How do you figure that allowing a more generous policy towards volunteers is shafting them? I don't. My point is that if the *volunteers* think they are getting shafted, they'll quit volunteering, and EAA knows that. It's fundamental economics... restrictive policies trim the volunteer pool, overly generous policies mean less folks paying their way. The trick is the find the proper "set point", and EAA seems to have found a workable one. Once I spend the time and money to go to an event like Oshkosh, I want to roam around it freely to suit myself. But if I were to volunteer my precious time there, I'd want more than to be given a free pass for next years show, after working all week during the present one. See my "fundamental economics" comment above. At any give "set point," there will be those who feel the drawbacks outweigh the benefits. Obviously, my "set point" is probably at least as high as yours, since I don't volunteer, either. You are way too protective of EAA's policies. What did you do, appoint yourself their goodwill ambassador? regardless of the fairness of their policies? Snicker.... Ron Wanttaja |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NS Norfolk Gate 2 NATOPS - All Hands Memorize Immediately! | Yofuri | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 17th 04 05:38 AM |
19 Sep 2004 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | September 19th 04 11:54 PM |
How I got to Oshkosh (long) | Doug | Owning | 2 | August 18th 03 12:05 AM |
Oshkosh Get together Roster - Sign in, please! | Jay Honeck | Owning | 2 | July 24th 03 09:11 PM |
Oshkosh Get together Roster - Sign in, please! | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 0 | July 24th 03 04:15 AM |