![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject line says it all. In light of the fact that VFR on top subjects
you to both VFR and IFR constraints, why would anyone ever choose to fly VFR on top? I can only think of two possible reasons: 1. There happens to be clear air at a +500 foot altitude and not at the corresponding even-thousand altitude (though how would know that without popping up 500 feet to have a look is still a mystery). 2. You can get a more direct routing because of the less restrictive separation requirements. Have I missed a possible reason? rg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hurricane relief | Gary Drescher | Owning | 67 | September 13th 05 06:09 AM |
Hurricane relief | Gary Drescher | Piloting | 66 | September 13th 05 06:09 AM |
Tent Buying Guide (long, print it out) | john smith | Piloting | 24 | August 5th 05 06:12 PM |
Czech body recommends gvt choose Gripen fighter | Karl | Military Aviation | 0 | December 1st 03 08:36 PM |
Bush's Trip: 747 or C-17 Which would you Choose? | Leadfoot | Military Aviation | 38 | November 30th 03 04:03 PM |