![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Morgans" wrote: "Frank Ch. Eigler" wrote But imagine the mass of smoke agent that would have to be dispensed in order for it to be visible 5-10 miles behind the jet. There would be a terrific amount of dilution through the air, moving at that kind of speed. Not to disagree with the fact that putting smoke systems on heavies would be a bad idea, but I do wonder about how much smoke would have to be used. I remember a few years ago at OSH, there was an older jet trainer (don't remember which type) that had smoke generators carefully place on the wingtips. The trail was tight, and spun fiercely for a very long time. ( 2 or more minutes?) I was fascinated. That's actually what keeps the plane in the air. See http://www.av8n.com/how/htm/airfoils...ation-vortices rg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Turbulence | Marco Rispoli | Piloting | 19 | October 17th 04 06:53 AM |
Wake Turbulence Question | HankPilot2002 | Piloting | 11 | July 14th 04 04:49 AM |
caution - wake turbulence | John Harlow | Piloting | 1 | June 4th 04 04:40 PM |
Wake turbulence avoidance and ATC | Peter R. | Piloting | 24 | December 20th 03 11:40 AM |
How much turbulence is too much? | Marty Ross | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 21st 03 05:30 PM |