![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is a CRANKSHAFT GEAR RETAINING BOLT AD 2004-10-14 effective June 25
2004, pertaining to certain types of Lycoming engines, which redefines "prop-strike" and states: "(e) Compliance with this AD is required as indicated before further flight if the engine experiences a propeller strike after the effective date of this AD, as defined in paragraphs (i) and (j) of this AD. " Crazy as it appears, there is some disagreement amongst some of us whether this AD demands 1. replacement of the retaining bolt & lockplate after the effective date of the AD on ALL "prop-strikes" -as newly defined- occuring BEFORE&AFTER the AD or whether the AD demands only 2. replacement of the retaining bolt & lockplate ONLY on "prop-strikes"- as newly defined- occuring AFTER the effective date of the AD. Does anyone have experience or information to clarify this for me? My interpretation is (2). Thanks, Tien (Posted on rec.aviation.owning as well) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Engine Balancing and Resonance Vibration Problem | AllanFuller | Owning | 13 | September 12th 05 12:51 AM |
my ignorance | LCT Paintball | Home Built | 25 | April 9th 05 06:54 PM |
Sensenich Wood Prop Question | [email protected] | Owning | 3 | April 4th 05 02:32 PM |
Lycoming 0-360 factory overhaul core charges - Does Air Powertell the truth ? | Mike Spera | Owning | 6 | December 13th 04 01:13 AM |
IVO props... comments.. | Dave S | Home Built | 16 | December 6th 03 11:43 PM |