![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 03:30:59 +0000 (UTC), Daniel Roesen wrote:
Hm... interesting. "optimum rate consistent with the operating characteristics of the aircraft". This is fuzzy. Nothing wrong with giving the pilot discretion over the rate of descent. However, there is a requirement to notify ATC if climb/descent rates will be less than 500 fpm. The most economically way to descend a jet is at near idle thrust, tactically. But strategically, that's only true if I'm on my computed economic descent path. So if ATC orders me earlier than reaching my ToD to "descend now FL270", at what rate do I descend? "optimum rate" would be very shallow and be not quick enough for the controller who wants to get me out of the way of something. Should I descend at near idle thrust? But that would bring me down much quicker than strategically economic, as I have to fly a longer distance on a suboptimal low flight level. You seem to be defining "optimum" as equivalent to "economic". I see no such implication in the US. I guess this is why in Europe a descent/climb instruction implies (unwritten rule) "1000fpm or more" - and actually the FMS of a 737NG seems to do exactly that (at least in the simulation that I have) when you initiate a VNAV descent earlier than ToD via the "DES NOW" function. It descends with 1000fpm until it either reaches the target altitude dialed in the MCP, or it crosses the computed optimum vertical descent path at which point it raises the rate of descend and lowers the thrust, in order to maintain the optimum descent path. Well, Europe has to handle a lot fewer aircraft than does US ATC. So maybe that's why they need more regulations. But wait, you stated that this is an "unwritten rule". So it's not a regulation, but merely an expectation. I would expect that if ATC clears a jet a/c to "descend now" that they would expect prompt execution and completion of the descent (as stated in the AIM) and that the rate of descent and so forth would be set out in the training manuals and possibly the ops specs of the carrier involved. Again, if it will be less than 500 fpm, the pilot should notify ATC. The AIM is available on line. Look at www.faa.gov for the publications. It is not regulatory, but its procedures are generally followed. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
No SID in clearance, fly it anyway? | Roy Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 195 | November 28th 05 10:06 PM |
Taxi Clearance | Ron Rosenfeld | Instrument Flight Rules | 27 | September 29th 05 01:57 PM |
Clearance: Direct to airport with /U | Judah | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | February 27th 04 06:02 PM |
Q about lost comms on weird clearance | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 34 | February 2nd 04 09:11 PM |
Picking up a Clearance Airborne | Brad Z | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | August 29th 03 01:31 AM |