![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As I said previously, the controller used nonstandard phraseology. The
controller from the start intended for the descent to be at pilot's discretion, she verified that it was when the pilot asked for clarification. The clearance was not amended. IF the controller intends to say "turn heading 270 intercept the localizer" but instead actually says "turn heading 170 intercept the localizer" and the pilot, sensing that 170 is not an approprite heading and that 270 is probably what was intended, asks "confirm heading 270, straight west" and the controller says "affermative, heading 270 intercept the localizer", was the clearance amended? Jose -- You can choose whom to befriend, but you cannot choose whom to love. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
No SID in clearance, fly it anyway? | Roy Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 195 | November 28th 05 10:06 PM |
Taxi Clearance | Ron Rosenfeld | Instrument Flight Rules | 27 | September 29th 05 01:57 PM |
Clearance: Direct to airport with /U | Judah | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | February 27th 04 06:02 PM |
Q about lost comms on weird clearance | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 34 | February 2nd 04 09:11 PM |
Picking up a Clearance Airborne | Brad Z | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | August 29th 03 01:31 AM |