![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tauno Voipio" wrote in message ... RST Engineering wrote: Also, to keep impedances correct, the splitter will likely either have to be lossy, or active. google "Wilkinson" "hybrid power divider" and "IRE Transactions" before saying stuff like this. What's the matter? The "matter" is defining "loss". In general, we do not say that a device is lossy unless the incoming power is greater than the outgoing power. In the case of the Wilkinson (or any variety of hybrid) splitter, the "loss" (if any) is measured in tenths of a dB for any decent design. There are a series of truly "lossy" resistive splitters that are not acceptable for this particular application. To divide the antenna power to several receivers always means some loss to a single receiver. In an ideal case, a passive divider to two branches will show a loss of 3 dB to both branches, and this means no power loss in the divider. An active divider can compensate for the losses with an amplifier. With something on the order of 26 dB active gain in the typical external GPS antenna, and with a loss of something on the order of 8 to 10 dB in the normal run of coax from antenna to receiver, you are still something like 16-18 dB ahead of the game over a stock passive antenna. A 3 dB reduction in signal level (30% in voltage) will not be noticeable. Why would you go to the hassle of an active splitter at 1.7 GHz. when it is not necessary? Remember, a good engineer can build a bridge that will stand up to maximum design loads plus safety factor. An EXCELLENT engineer can build a bridge that will stand up to maximum design loads plus safety factor JUST BARELY. The division losses always exceed zero if the impedances are not properly matched, which will show more than 3 dB in divide to two. Like I said, in a properly designed hybrid, losses are measured in feathers, not bricks. -- Tauno Voipio, avionics engineer tauno voipio (at) iki fi Jim Weir Avionics Technician at 16 Avionics Engineer at 22 Avionics Engineer Emeritus after 40 years in the 'biz with any kind of luck at all in a couple more years. (Emeritus = "on the shelf") |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gyrocopter VHF antenna length | Lew | Home Built | 2 | August 18th 05 01:52 PM |
I Hate Radios | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 9 | June 6th 05 05:39 PM |
ELT antenna -- Pitts | Al MacDonald | Home Built | 0 | July 15th 04 03:27 PM |
Ext antenna connection for handheld radio | Ray Andraka | Owning | 7 | March 5th 04 01:10 PM |
comm's RX antenna | acepilot | Home Built | 5 | March 3rd 04 05:34 PM |