![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 13:50:12 -0500, "O. Sami Saydjari"
wrote: The Approach in question is SDF RWY 2 at KISW. I was coming in from the south, nearly lined up with the inbound course of 021 degrees. I was in touch with ATC. The LOM/IAF is called NEPCO. The ATC asked if I wanted "direct NEPCO." I said yes. Within about 10 miles of the airport, the controller said that frequency change was approved. I believe I was out of radar contact by this time (radar coverage in the area is spotty). I don't see in your summary where the controller cleared you for the approach??? If so, what altitude did he tell you to maintain until NEPCO? 1. Since there is no "NO PT" indicated on the chart, does that mean that I am required to do a 180 deg turn when I reach NEPCO so I can track outbound (201), then do a PT, then come back? Yes That seems a little odd to me. Probably because we don't have all the data. 2. If so, and I am assuming it is, should I have positioned myself to approach NEPCO at an intercept that did not require a 180 deg turn to get to the outbound course? Maybe come at it from the east? If you are starting out south of the airport, it seems to me to be quicker to fly to NEPCO and then do the PT as you are losing altitude. 3. Suppose that when I reach NEPCO (IAF), I am below the cloud deck. Assume that I have switched over to unicom frequency at that point. Is it permissible to abort the IFR approach and turn inbound for a visual approach. Presumably, you would have to ask ATC permission to do this. Correct. What if you can not raise ATC on the radio? Can you go visual on your own? In an emergency situation, yes. If not, try to get a relay from FSS or another a/c. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why is ADF or Radar Required on MFD ILS RWY 32 Approach Plate? | S. Ramirez | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | April 2nd 04 11:13 AM |
Why an NDB approach with a miss to an intersection? | Ben Jackson | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | March 25th 04 03:53 AM |
Changes to Aircraft Approach Categories?! | skyliner | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | February 9th 04 08:55 PM |
Which of these approaches is loggable? | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | August 16th 03 05:22 PM |
IR checkride story! | Guy Elden Jr. | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | August 1st 03 09:03 PM |