![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have to say, I'm puzzled as to why you would think there's any
connection at all between medical research and religious conviction. Well, my old religion, Catholicism, has come a long ways, thanks to science. (Not far enough, mind you, but that's another post.) For example, Catholics couldn't eat meat on Fridays, when I was a boy. They also used to make kids sit in mass every day for an hour, and if you moved or talked, you were punished. They also used to believe in beating children who misbehaved. (Go back farther, and they REALLY believed some stupid things.) I suppose you could say that "science" had little to do with those changes, but I would argue that as the flock became more scientifically savvy, it became impossible for the clergy to continue to pull the wool over their eyes. Everyone now knows that eating a hot dog on Friday isn't going to send you straight to Hell, everyone now knows that forcing little kids to sit still and not talk for an hour each day is almost guaranteed to drive them away from the church as adults, and everyone now knows that beating children is a poor way to teach. So, following that logical trajectory, perhaps in another generation every LDS will "know" that not having a glass of wine with dinner is bad for their health? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|