![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Rind wrote:
Matt Whiting wrote: I heard back from Amy. As I stated above, she was referring specifically to a student pilot and apparently the "sole manipulator" rule prohibits a non-instructor pilot from allowing a student pilot to manipulate the controls as this would constitute the student pilot carrying a passenger. However, I don't see why this would matter which seat you were sitting in. If this is illegal, seems it would be as illegal to have the student in the right seat. It also seems odd that you can let a non-student handle the controls and be legal, but can't let a student pilot legally fly when you are in the airplane. That, of course, is even crazier. There is no rule that prevents a non-instructor pilot from letting someone else manipulate the controls, or even takeoff and land the plane. The "sole manipulator" rule applies to logging time (and even with that there was some odd letter from the FAA implying that if there were no one else on board who could possibly be PIC, you could log the time that a passenger was manipulating the controls). A student isn't "carrying a passenger" if he or she manipulates the controls when someone else is PIC. The PIC is responsible for the plane and the passenger no matter who is at the controls. The FAA isn't always logical. I got a third email from Amy and she said an acquaintance of hers was a student pilot and went up with another pilot (not an instructor) and was flying in the left seat. The FAA caught wind of this and made the claim that the student was acting as PIC because they were the sole manipulator of the controls and was seated in the left seat which is traditionally the seat occupied by the PIC. Since another person was in the airplane at the time, the student lost their certificate for 120 days for carrying a passenger illegally. She said this was challenged and was upheld in court. I don't know all the details and am not going to send Amy a 4th email, but I have no reason to doubt what she's saying. I've read enough stories about FAA actions and NTSB appeals to know that logic seems often absent in these proceedings. Matt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The National Lake Eutrophication Survey 1971-1973 | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 18 | June 16th 04 02:27 AM |
Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post | MrHabilis | Home Built | 0 | June 11th 04 05:07 PM |
Seat cushion | Ernest Christley | Home Built | 14 | August 5th 03 07:16 PM |
Seat cushions | Big John | Home Built | 3 | July 31st 03 10:59 PM |
seeking info from NW Ontario/ Upper Midwest Pilots flying intoAtikokan | David Megginson | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | July 9th 03 03:04 PM |