A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

sliding wings?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #23  
Old March 1st 06, 06:56 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default sliding wings?

wrote:


hi richard: could you possibly give me some numerical illustrations?
I am not sure where your numbers are coming from (17.2?, 295?), but
this is probably just my ignorance. obviously, going from 0 to 1 sqft
of wing is a useful weight/lift tradeoff... :-) is your point that the
current wing size (of any plane) is already the optimal weight/lift
tradeoff? strange that better materials over the last 50 years would
not have changed the optimum.

regards,

/iaw


I'll give it a try, but you owe me lunch now!


No, not trying to say that all wings are already optimal.
Especally for all missions.

Just that one must look carefully at
proposed performance gains / weight increase.

Write this down: "It's ALL about WEIGHT"

Material gains over the last 100(!) years have been amazing.
For instance, can you imagine a wooden 747
Think I'm kidding?
Check out this 600 passenger design proposal by Bel Geddess,
presented at the New Your Worlds Fair in 1940.
And it's a SPAN LOADER, too!

http://www.home.earthlink.net/~tp-1/ged.pdf




the mystery numbers?
Nothing mysterious here.
It's just arithmetic.

refer to page 25 of Aerodynamics for Naval Aviators

Anybody have a link to this?
It is an excellent starting point for basic aerodynamics.


Going back to...
L = Cl S q


This is the basic lift equasion (well, one of many forms)
Rearrange that equasion to solve for L, CL, S, or even q.

Cl is the coeffecient of lift that we are looking at.

S is Wing Surface Area is Sq Feet

q (rho) is dynamic pressure in pounds per square foot.
q = 1/2 density * velocity squared
Density in Slugs per cubic ft.
V in feet per second).

using q = (sigma V^2)/295 (V in knots, TAS)


295 is a conversion factor that converts FPS to knots

Greek leter Sigma is used for density ratio.
That's ambient pressure / standard day pressure
At sea level standard day, sigma is 1, and drops out.


L = Cl (Sigma V^2 /295) S


So if sigma is 1 then L = CL V^2 S / 295

then solving for V

V = 17.2 Sqrt(L / Cl Sigma S)


17.2 is ~ the square root of 295

Simplified for stall speed at sea level...

Vstall = 17.2 (WEIGHT / CLmax S) Since Lift = Weight


Stall speed implies Maximum Coeffeceint of Lift for a given airfoil.

We need as much lift as weight for straight and level flight,
So L = W = L (are the same)


Well, it's late and I'm bushed.
I've read that over several times, and now it doesn't make sense
to me either.

We'll do lunch another day, ok?

Richard
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VP-II wings available in Oregon, USA (Or, "How I was coconuted...") Roberto Waltman Home Built 2 October 29th 04 04:21 PM
Charging for Wings safety seminar? Marty Shapiro Piloting 19 June 23rd 04 05:28 PM
Double covering fabric covered wings [email protected] Home Built 9 May 9th 04 08:39 PM
Stolen "Champ" wings located...from 23,000 feet!! Tom Pappano Piloting 17 December 15th 03 01:24 PM
Wings from "Champ" stolen in Oklahoma after emergency landing Tom Pappano Piloting 1 December 7th 03 05:02 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.