![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Whelan" wrote in message ... Jack wrote: I read Mr. Greenwell's comments with the same respect I usually have for his comments. I have to disagree with him on this one. Instructors and some seasoned pilots told me what a man-killer a 1-35 was. With 27 total flight hours, I flew it, and I still wonder just what they were referring to. I have 128 hours in a 1-35 and now own a PIK-20B... ooooohhh... those nasty flaps! If I listened to every warning from every misinformed person that doesn't like the subject glider, for whatever reason, I would have never taken that first ride in a Pratt-Reid so many years ago. Just because a guy or lady can be an instructor doesn't mean he or she is an expert or even a good pilot. Conversly, just because someone is a good pilot, doesn't mean that he or she can be a good instructor. Stories about not having the elevator hooked up and the like are very helpful, and they make us all more careful pilots. Stories about the supposed bad behavior of a particular sailplane model only damage our sport. I saw some recent, veiled references to the 1-35 and it's supposed bad habits in Soaring Magazine and they didn't print my reply. I think that's sad, especially for someone that might really enjoy flying one, and for someone that has one for sale. I have 1 flight of 2 hours in a Standard Cirrus. What a nice ship it was... but then... I'm not in the habit of flying hands-off... Just my $.02 worth. Jack Womack Clovis, NM Forgive me, but it's a long, dank, snowy, week at the end of winter... IMHO Jack touches upon a fact of soaring life inescapable for all who fly single seat sailplanes, namely: at some point everyone who does, must rely upon their individual judgment that it is safe for them to fly a given single-seat ship. As obvious and fatuous a statement that may seem to many, it's true whether or not an instructor agrees with him or her, and it has implications for every single-seat gliderpilot. We live in a world in which the routine application of individual judgment helps us survive (and sometimes not). Attempting to abdicate such reality may (arguably) lead to a safer life, but in the case of soaring a genuinely poorer one for most. How many flights would not be made, how many ships not flown, how many growth experiences delayed or never experienced, all because an instructor's judgment conflicted with a seeker of knowledge? Instructors are human, and - in my judgement! - come with human foibles, biases, skills and judgment. For better or worse - and mostly the better! - we're stuck with relying upon their judgments for much of our early training. But there comes a day when if we are to continue to grow as pilots, we inevitably begin to rely more on our own judgment. That's just a fact...whether it's good or bad depends on how sound our own judgment is. As a pilot who transitioned to flaps-only single-seaters from a 1-26 and who has never flown any other types since, I read & heard then when I sought ship-specific knowledge (and continue to read & hear) all sorts of misinformation in the glider world - not merely about flaps - too often presented as fact rather than opinion or judgment. We live in an imperfect world, and I expect that sort of misinformation will be around lots longer than I, so the circle is complete: it's necessary to apply one's own judgment to information presented. The better instructors will help their students understand the need to apply judgment and develop the skills and confidence to do so, while not blindly or uncritically passing along misinformation. Tangentially (but not unrelated, in my view), safety in soaring is 'merely' another side of having fun. Whatever you choose to do, whether legal or of sound judgment or not, if you have an accident while doing it, it will be less fun than if you didn't! Ideas have consequences. May all your ideas prove personally rewarding, your skills up to the tasks' demands, and your judgment sound. Most of all, have fun!!! Regards, Bob W. Who says there isn't wisdom on RAS. Two great opinions in a row. Congratulations Bob and Jack. There are few bad gliders but there are many bad pilots, unfortunately. Bill Daniels |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cirrus demo | Dan Luke | Piloting | 12 | December 4th 05 05:26 AM |
New G-1000 182 & Cirrus SR-22 GTS | Dan Luke | Owning | 22 | June 27th 05 07:18 PM |
New G-1000 182 & Cirrus SR-22 GTS | Dan Luke | Piloting | 24 | June 27th 05 07:18 PM |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
Cirrus SR22 Purchase advice needed. | C J Campbell | Piloting | 122 | May 10th 04 11:30 PM |