![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"cavelamb" wrote in message
ink.net... Peter Dohm wrote: "T o d d P a t t i s t" wrote in message ... "Peter Dohm" wrote: The Embry-Riddle link leads to someespecially fascinating discussion, including that some efects of the dimples are related to Reynolds Number. However, I clearly have a distance to go before understanding this subject--even enough to safely apply any rules of thumb. If you are interested in the aerodynamics of spinning balls, or want to try to extend the state of our knowledge of aerodynamics as applied to aircraft design, then by all means, keep on looking at dimples. However, if your real interest is in reducing the drag of an aircraft, you'd be better off studying up on laminar flow and interference drag. There is enough information out there in the glider community on fairings, control seals, inexpensive laminar flow testing techniques (old motor oil, pieces of yarn, microphones or stethoscopes) to keep you busy for a long time and which will really produce drag reduction. -- T o d d P a t t i s t (Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.) Make a commitment to learn something from every flight. Share what you learn. Well, I already know a lot of the rules of thumb for drag reduction, especially with laminar flow, and that is my first choice for choosing or building an airplane. I am also interested in general aerodynamics, and am somewhat intrigued by the issue of dimples. Particularly, grooves and dimples could be quite interesting as related to propellers. Regrettably, there is a /very/ finite limit to the percentage of time I can devote to that, so my progress may be gradual. Regards, Peter All we need is a wind tunnel... You're right. Then we could prove a lot one way or the other--especially if a little smoke was part of the system. There would still be the effects of scale and Reynolds number, which are supposed to be quite significant, but a lot could still be learned. At least it should be possible to either verify or deny the assertion that grooved or dimpled props produce a virtual "switch pitch" effect. Maybe next year. Regards, Peter |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VP-II wings available in Oregon, USA (Or, "How I was coconuted...") | Roberto Waltman | Home Built | 2 | October 29th 04 04:21 PM |
Charging for Wings safety seminar? | Marty Shapiro | Piloting | 19 | June 23rd 04 05:28 PM |
Double covering fabric covered wings | [email protected] | Home Built | 9 | May 9th 04 08:39 PM |
Stolen "Champ" wings located...from 23,000 feet!! | Tom Pappano | Piloting | 17 | December 15th 03 01:24 PM |
Wings from "Champ" stolen in Oklahoma after emergency landing | Tom Pappano | Piloting | 1 | December 7th 03 05:02 AM |