![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 01:33:35 GMT, "John R. Copeland"
wrote: "SimGuy" wrote in message ... On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 23:13:21 +0000 (UTC), (Paul Tomblin) wrote: In a previous article, said: The plate is here- http://www.airnav.com/depart?http://.../05889VDGC.PDF While trying to fly the approach in the sim I flew to the MAP with relative ease but had trouble getting low enough to make the runway without getting too hot. Looking at the plate it seems a drop of 2380' must be made between MAFMU and the runway in a lateral distance of 1.4NM, this is a descent angle of 15 degrees! Well, yes, if you don't see the runway until the MAP and then want to land on the runway ahead, you will have a very steep descent. But there are two factors mitigating that: - you might see the runway earlier and - it's a circling approach, so you can circle around airport to descend if you need to. Even if the runway is spotted well before the MAP, say at, ALLIX, it's a very steep descent. At 100kts it is 1140fpm. I'm not an expert, but this looks like a tough approach; the MA looks challenging too. Would it even be possible in a 172 or would it would too under-powered? I imagine you would want something with plenty of extra oomph. Yes, it *is* a tough approach. I've flown it for real a few times, and I'm pretty sure it's *possible* to get down without circling, but I've never actually done that. (I have excuses, of course. :-)) Approach Control is accustomed to hearing requests for something like a left 360 to lose altitude during final approach. They've always let me maneuver however I've needed. I wouldn't expect to see a loaded 172 making the 14000-ft initial altitude. I've had 172s higher than that, but only when lightly loaded. I suggest crossing Red Table slow, with gear and flaps already extended. Set prop(s) at high RPM to increase drag, too, if applicable. If you don't do that, you'll need to circle somewhere over the Roaring Fork River. You don't need to reach the airport before circling, just be in VMC. Remember that the northeast bank of the river is a high plateau, and it's a noise-sensitive area that you should try to respect. If you *do* circle the airport, you will scare the daylights out of your passengers as you approach the base-to-final turn. A rock wall fills your windshield! You can look it up on Google Earth, if you wish, but I can tell you that it looks worse in real life than it appears on Google Earth. Thanks! Your explanation really helped. I will now go and try it in the sim again, this time in a 182. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OLV GPS 36 approach question | A Lieberma | Instrument Flight Rules | 59 | August 15th 06 12:32 AM |
procedure turns revisited | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 37 | June 20th 06 03:39 AM |
VOR/DME approach radio calls | Derek Fage | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | December 8th 04 11:36 PM |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Canadian holding procedures | Derrick Early | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 22nd 04 04:03 PM |