![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Note that the angle is given on then chart, at about 10
degrees. This is possible for some STOL aircraft, but 3 degrees is an average. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P "Mark Hansen" wrote in message ... | On 08/05/06 20:16, Bob Gardner wrote: | Yes. The minimum descent altitude is 10,200...either land (good luck!), | circle, or do the miss at the MAP. I've never done this approach in a sim or | in real life, so I'm just going by the plate. | | As a general rule, not limited to this approach, nothing regulatory keeps | you from landing straight in if you are in position to do so, even with | circling-only minima. Doing so will always be tough. | | Well, they say you must be able to complete the approach and land using | "normal" maneuvers. They don't define "normal", but I would think a really | steep descent would not be normal. | | | Bob Gardner | | | Bob Gardner | | "SimGuy" wrote in message | ... | | | "SimGuy" wrote in message | news ![]() | | http://www.airnav.com/depart?http://.../05889VDGC.PDF | | While trying to fly the approach in the sim I flew to the MAP with | relative ease but had trouble getting low enough to make the runway | without getting too hot. Looking at the plate it seems a drop of 2380' | must be made between MAFMU and the runway in a lateral distance of | 1.4NM, this is a descent angle of 15 degrees! | | Could someone please confirm this or help with my interpretation of | the chart. I am a PP beginning instrument training. | | TIA | | On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 18:09:35 -0700, "Bob Gardner" | wrote: | | You get a clue from the fact that there are no straight-in minimums. Then | there is the "C" in the title. When there is no runway number, one of two | things is evident: either the runway is not aligned with the final | approach | course (not in this case, of course), or the descent rate does not meet | the | 400-foot per mile maximum allowable descent rate. You have to circle. | | Bob Gardner | | (you top-posted so I moved your message) | | Thanks, that makes much more sense. But I have a question- the | circling minimum is 10,200', this applies up to the MAP right? | Obviously in circling the runway one would need to get lower. | | | | | | -- | Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane | Cal Aggie Flying Farmers | Sacramento, CA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OLV GPS 36 approach question | A Lieberma | Instrument Flight Rules | 59 | August 15th 06 12:32 AM |
procedure turns revisited | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 37 | June 20th 06 03:39 AM |
VOR/DME approach radio calls | Derek Fage | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | December 8th 04 11:36 PM |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Canadian holding procedures | Derrick Early | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 22nd 04 04:03 PM |