A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Help understanding Aspen VOR/DME approach



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #20  
Old August 6th 06, 04:44 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default Help understanding Aspen VOR/DME approach

Note that the angle is given on then chart, at about 10
degrees. This is possible for some STOL aircraft, but 3
degrees is an average.


--
James H. Macklin
ATP,CFI,A&P

"Mark Hansen" wrote in message
...
| On 08/05/06 20:16, Bob Gardner wrote:
| Yes. The minimum descent altitude is 10,200...either
land (good luck!),
| circle, or do the miss at the MAP. I've never done this
approach in a sim or
| in real life, so I'm just going by the plate.
|
| As a general rule, not limited to this approach, nothing
regulatory keeps
| you from landing straight in if you are in position to
do so, even with
| circling-only minima. Doing so will always be tough.
|
| Well, they say you must be able to complete the approach
and land using
| "normal" maneuvers. They don't define "normal", but I
would think a really
| steep descent would not be normal.
|
|
| Bob Gardner
|
|
| Bob Gardner
|
| "SimGuy" wrote in message
| ...
|
|
| "SimGuy" wrote in message
| news | The plate is here-
|
|
http://www.airnav.com/depart?http://.../05889VDGC.PDF
|
| While trying to fly the approach in the sim I flew to
the MAP with
| relative ease but had trouble getting low enough to
make the runway
| without getting too hot. Looking at the plate it
seems a drop of 2380'
| must be made between MAFMU and the runway in a
lateral distance of
| 1.4NM, this is a descent angle of 15 degrees!
|
| Could someone please confirm this or help with my
interpretation of
| the chart. I am a PP beginning instrument training.
|
| TIA
|
| On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 18:09:35 -0700, "Bob Gardner"

| wrote:
|
| You get a clue from the fact that there are no
straight-in minimums. Then
| there is the "C" in the title. When there is no runway
number, one of two
| things is evident: either the runway is not aligned
with the final
| approach
| course (not in this case, of course), or the descent
rate does not meet
| the
| 400-foot per mile maximum allowable descent rate. You
have to circle.
|
| Bob Gardner
|
| (you top-posted so I moved your message)
|
| Thanks, that makes much more sense. But I have a
question- the
| circling minimum is 10,200', this applies up to the MAP
right?
| Obviously in circling the runway one would need to get
lower.
|
|
|
|
|
| --
| Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane
| Cal Aggie Flying Farmers
| Sacramento, CA


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OLV GPS 36 approach question A Lieberma Instrument Flight Rules 59 August 15th 06 12:32 AM
procedure turns revisited [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 37 June 20th 06 03:39 AM
VOR/DME approach radio calls Derek Fage Instrument Flight Rules 12 December 8th 04 11:36 PM
VOR/DME Approach Question Chip Jones Instrument Flight Rules 47 August 29th 04 05:03 AM
Canadian holding procedures Derrick Early Instrument Flight Rules 24 July 22nd 04 04:03 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.