![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() -----Original Message----- From: Gary Drescher ] Posted At: Monday, August 07, 2006 8:13 AM Posted To: rec.aviation.ifr Conversation: CAT IIIC minimums Subject: CAT IIIC minimums "Jim Carter" wrote in message news:001c01c6b9e5$41b26ee0$4001a8c0@omnibook6100.. . The lowest authorized ILS minimums, with all required ground and airborne systems components operative, are .... I found ... on page 5-49 of the Instrument Procedures Handbook at http://www.faa.gov/library/manuals/a...ocedures_handb oo k/ .... No, NA means "not authorized". See http://www.naco.faa.gov/content/naco..._IAP_Intro.pdf , p. 53. (Also, Jeppesen's Instrument/Commercial Manual, Appendix B, lists NA as an abbreviation for "not authorized".) The material you cited above is entirely consistent with the "not authorized" meaning. Gary, I pulled up the pdf file you supplied as reference and had adobe search for the "not authorized" phrase. There is only one instance found under the Alternate Minimums paragraph on page 53: "If NA appears, alternate minimums are not authorized due to unmonitored facility or absence of weather reporting service." I did not reference Jeppesen because they are not the authority for this information. Could this be a case of NA meaning one thing for CAT IIIc and something else for other purposes? It probably would have made more sense if the visibility requirement was shown as not required or inapplicable. How could an approach be authorized if the visibility requirement is "not authorized"? There is no CAT IIIc approach into JFK for runway 4R Sorry, can you say how you arrived at that conclusion? There is no CAT IIIc minima listed on the plate even though there is CAT IIIa and b. which is why it is not listed on the plate. Couldn't it be unlisted because there are no DA or RVR limitations to list? --Gary No, then it would be an unpublished approach wouldn't it? The definition of CAT IIIc is zero/zero (more explicit language is found in my original reference). The approach would be listed on the JFK plate if it was approved and published. The EWS plate lists all three approach minima. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Alternate minimums same as forecast weather | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | February 21st 06 10:45 PM |
Middle Marker minimums | S Herman | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | June 9th 05 05:28 PM |
Canadian departure minimums? | Derrick Early | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | August 9th 04 01:43 PM |
Skymap IIIC Mounting Options | NW_PILOT | Owning | 15 | July 8th 04 01:41 PM |
Personal Weather Minimums | FryGuy | Piloting | 26 | December 9th 03 06:09 AM |