![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
IIIB, and IIIC. There's a section of the plate that lists visibility
limitations for the subcategories; the omission of IIIC from that section means that there is no visibility limitation for IIIC. I have to disagree with you on that: I believe the omission of certain approach minimums equates to a statement that such approach is not authorized. On the same plate (KJFK 4R CAT III), there's no circling minimums, and this doesn't obviously imply that circling with no visibility limitation is allowed. Andrey The EWS plate lists all three approach minima. Assuming that's a typo for EWR (I find no EWS), the plate for ILS 4R CAT III does not list minima for IIIC; rather, it says the IIIC approach is not authorized (NA). http://www.naco.faa.gov/d-tpp/0608/00285I4RC3.PDF --Gary |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Alternate minimums same as forecast weather | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | February 21st 06 10:45 PM |
Middle Marker minimums | S Herman | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | June 9th 05 05:28 PM |
Canadian departure minimums? | Derrick Early | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | August 9th 04 01:43 PM |
Skymap IIIC Mounting Options | NW_PILOT | Owning | 15 | July 8th 04 01:41 PM |
Personal Weather Minimums | FryGuy | Piloting | 26 | December 9th 03 06:09 AM |