![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
oups.com... [...] Does it seem counterintuitive to push on the yoke to maintain altitude in a turn? Something sounds fishy. Sure, of course something sounds fishy. That would be your clue that your analysis is wrong. I don't fully even understand what you're trying to propose. For one, you can't increase your load factor (and thus lift) without either increasing thrust or decreasing airspeed. The moment you increase the lift, drag increases and the airplane will start to slow down until thrust equals drag again. As far as the parts of your question that I think I comprehend go... From personal experience, at 100 knots in a C172, you will remain on the "front side of the power curve" with the proposed maneuver. That is, a reduction in airspeed will compensate for the increased drag. That said, of course if you select a power setting that provides less thrust than the minimum drag at the doubled lift, you cannot expect to enter a 60 degree bank and remain in level flight. Even at L/Dmax, engine thrust will be less than drag and the airplane will slow further into the "back side of the power curve". Only by descending can you get enough thrust to balance drag. Note that in this latter case, being on the "back side of the power curve" won't help you. Yes, speeding up would reduce drag, but the reason you get into that situation in the first place is that there's NO airspeed at which you can reduce drag enough to be below or equal to the available thrust. Even if you speed up to exactly L/Dmax airspeed, you still need to maintain a descent, because there's just not enough engine thrust. All that speeding up gets you is a shallower descent angle (just as would be the case in a straight-ahead descent). In other words, being in a 60 degree bank doesn't change the basic concepts...only the specific airspeeds at which things happen. This all assumes, of course, that you *start* on the "front side of the power curve". If you are in level flight on the "back side", then yes...speeding up allows you to fly with less thrust, the excess then which you can then use to compensate for drag induced by a bank. All of the above is posted in good faith. You are correct when you say you were confused back when you posted previously, but I have to say that today's post exhibits some of the same "overcomplicating" behavior we saw back then. You don't get something for nothing, and no matter how you manage to state the question, the airplane always flies the same. I hope this question doesn't devolve into a similar quagmire as we saw "back then". I know I don't have the patience for it. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Change in AIM wording concerning procedure turn | Kris Kortokrax | Instrument Flight Rules | 208 | October 14th 05 12:58 AM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Procedure Turn | Bravo8500 | Instrument Flight Rules | 65 | April 22nd 04 03:27 AM |
Rate of turn indicator on commercial jets (Boeing / Airbus) | Mark | Simulators | 1 | November 1st 03 10:35 AM |