A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Turn dynamics



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2  
Old September 26th 06, 09:38 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 774
Default Turn dynamics

wrote in message
oups.com...
[...] Does it seem counterintuitive to
push on the yoke to maintain altitude in a turn? Something sounds
fishy.


Sure, of course something sounds fishy. That would be your clue that your
analysis is wrong.

I don't fully even understand what you're trying to propose. For one, you
can't increase your load factor (and thus lift) without either increasing
thrust or decreasing airspeed. The moment you increase the lift, drag
increases and the airplane will start to slow down until thrust equals drag
again.

As far as the parts of your question that I think I comprehend go...

From personal experience, at 100 knots in a C172, you will remain on the
"front side of the power curve" with the proposed maneuver. That is, a
reduction in airspeed will compensate for the increased drag. That said, of
course if you select a power setting that provides less thrust than the
minimum drag at the doubled lift, you cannot expect to enter a 60 degree
bank and remain in level flight. Even at L/Dmax, engine thrust will be less
than drag and the airplane will slow further into the "back side of the
power curve". Only by descending can you get enough thrust to balance drag.

Note that in this latter case, being on the "back side of the power curve"
won't help you. Yes, speeding up would reduce drag, but the reason you get
into that situation in the first place is that there's NO airspeed at which
you can reduce drag enough to be below or equal to the available thrust.
Even if you speed up to exactly L/Dmax airspeed, you still need to maintain
a descent, because there's just not enough engine thrust. All that speeding
up gets you is a shallower descent angle (just as would be the case in a
straight-ahead descent).

In other words, being in a 60 degree bank doesn't change the basic
concepts...only the specific airspeeds at which things happen. This all
assumes, of course, that you *start* on the "front side of the power curve".
If you are in level flight on the "back side", then yes...speeding up allows
you to fly with less thrust, the excess then which you can then use to
compensate for drag induced by a bank.

All of the above is posted in good faith. You are correct when you say you
were confused back when you posted previously, but I have to say that
today's post exhibits some of the same "overcomplicating" behavior we saw
back then. You don't get something for nothing, and no matter how you
manage to state the question, the airplane always flies the same. I hope
this question doesn't devolve into a similar quagmire as we saw "back then".
I know I don't have the patience for it.

Pete


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? Rick Umali Piloting 29 February 15th 06 04:40 AM
Change in AIM wording concerning procedure turn Kris Kortokrax Instrument Flight Rules 208 October 14th 05 12:58 AM
Nearly had my life terminated today Michelle P Piloting 11 September 3rd 05 02:37 AM
Procedure Turn Bravo8500 Instrument Flight Rules 65 April 22nd 04 03:27 AM
Rate of turn indicator on commercial jets (Boeing / Airbus) Mark Simulators 1 November 1st 03 10:35 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.