![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Marc Ramsey wrote:
Why would you want a Mode S transponder to be fed by a GPS? The Extended Squitter variation of ADS-B does layer on top of the Mode S downlink protocol, but simply feeding GPS data to a Mode S transponder will not make it ADS-B compliant. An entirely new box will be needed. The only reason to use a Mode S transponder in the US (outside of the categories of aircraft for which it is mandated) is to take advantage of the uplinked traffic and weather information, which needs an expensive and power hungry multi-function display. Since some of those services are now being shut down in anticipation of ADS-B deployment, even that reason is slowly being rendered meaningless. Also, do not forget that it costs roughly twice as much to recertify a Mode S transponder, and you may have to go farther to find a shop that has the right test equipment. In response to the original poster, if you spend extra money to install and maintain a Mode S (instead of C) transponder in a glider operating in the US, you're simply wasting money... Marc Gary Emerson wrote: AH, but the real question is... would a 302 or other GPS be capable of generating the data that could be fed to a Mode S transponder? Yeah, yeah all the illegal stuff and your insurance would never pay if you ground looped..., but would it work or are the certified GPS units sending out a different data protocol? hans wrote: Hi Tom! your 302 does not qualify as a certified GPS for the mode S transponder. Best Regards Hans Tom N. schrieb: I live in San Antonio, Texas, USA. We fly out of a field 15 nautical miles away from San Antonio International airport and are basically on final approach for a lot of jet traffic. There are also two Air Force bases in the immediate area. There is no requirement in the U.S. to have mode S as there will be in Europe. However, if there is less power consumption due to fewer interrogations or if there is more accuracy on TCAS, I would be willing to go with it. I use a Cambridge 302 for GPS. Stefan wrote: Tom N. schrieb: Any opinions? I plan to install a new Becker transponder in my ASW-28. Should I go with the old mode C unit or pay extra for the new mode S unit? Thanks. Tor answer this question, it would be extremely helpful to know in which part of the world you intend to fly. Hi Marc - I purchased mode S simply because there doesn't seem to be a material cost difference with the current available equipment. In Europe and other parts of the world, Mode S is becoming required, so as I may take my toy and fly in other countries it seems prudent ! I haven't checked if there's any difference in recertification cost with the local shops. Hope that helps, Best Regards, Dave |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Breaking News.... (?) | john smith | Piloting | 1 | August 19th 05 02:13 AM |
Loss of Mode C and Transponder Reply | mikem | Owning | 4 | February 27th 04 05:52 PM |
WTB: Mode C Transponder | Chris Batcheller | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | February 21st 04 01:31 PM |