![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All it does is relieve the pressure. If there were no trim at all the elevator would be in the exact same position, it would just suck to have to hold it there.
Well, not exactly, not on all aircraft. Consider a trim system which uses a trim tab. The tab projects (say) up, causing the elevator to trail down as its neutral position, pushing the tail up and thus the nose down. Once equilbrium has been reached (no pressure), clamp the elevator in that position, and trim in such a manner that the tab no longer projects up. Now, the elevator is (slightly) more effective at pushing the tail up, because the trim tab is no longer in the airflow in the opposite direction. The nose will be pushed (slightly) further down, and the clamp will be resisting pressure. If you release the clamp, going to a new "no pressure" condition, the elevator =will= move. Looked at another way, if you come from an untrimmed position (with this same aircraft), and position the yoke wherever it needs to be in order to maintain the condition you want (say, straight and level, FSOA), and then clamp the yoke in that position, you will be at the chosen condition. But if you trim, the movement of the trim tab =will= have a (slight) aerodynamic effect. When you actually achieve "no pressure", you will be (slightly) out of trim for the effect you want. 1: I understand the effect is slight, perhaps even not noticable, but I'll bet it can be measured. 2: I understand that when a real pilot actually trims for "no pressure", there is a feedback loop where "no change in flight condition" also feeds into it, so the above discussion is academic. 3: I understand that this will not be true, or will not be true for the same reasons, for other trim systems. However, the quoted statement above is not true, and if Mx made that statement, he would have been jumped on, just because it's Mx making that statement. Jose -- He who laughs, lasts. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Differences between automotive & airplane engines | Chris Wells | Home Built | 105 | February 18th 06 11:00 PM |
Pocket PC Weight and Balance Spreadsheet | Navzilla Support | Piloting | 0 | October 9th 05 11:47 PM |
Cessna 172 F Weight and Balance | [email protected] | Owning | 8 | September 22nd 05 02:38 AM |
172S Weight and Balance Question | David J | Piloting | 9 | March 23rd 04 01:08 AM |
Weight and balance.. | Bart | Rotorcraft | 9 | August 19th 03 02:57 AM |