![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
chris writes:
A good landing starts with a good approach. If you don't get your approach sorted out you are almost certain to stuff the landing up. I know. I guess I'm just impatient. I wouldn't be that way in real life, but in the sim it's often different, as one doesn't always have the time to fly for a long period, and I like to practice take-offs and landings at tiny airports as I encounter them. A good airspeed for crossing the fence is VSo x 1.3. Find out what your stall speed is, multiply by 1.3 and you have your speed at short finals. You can add a bit for the early part of the approach, for a 172 you might use 70-80 kt on approach, reducing to 55 kt on short finals. Hmm ... well, I've been coming in at around 100 kts, which just happens to be the full-flaps Vso plus 30%, as you suggest (in the Baron, Vso is 75 kts). So I guess I haven't been going as fast as I thought. After reading what some people suggest--that the aircraft should stall as it lands--I thought that perhaps I was coming in too fast. Usually I'll stay at right around 100 or so practically to touchdown. As I'm gliding above the runway I'll reduce power and let the aircraft settle on its own. It seems to be very smooth. The only disadvantage is that I need a longer runway. But most runways are more than long enough for my small plane, so there's no reason to rush down to the ground that I can see. Whatever light aircraft you fly will be similar, can't speak for the heavies though.. If you use much more than 80kt on approach it can be difficult to get rid of the speed while still descending. I try to come in with a good rate of descent at 100. Then, when I'm close to the runway and coming into ground effect, I stop the descent, which causes my airspeed to drop rapidly. As that brings me down, I progressively flare until the wheels touch. In heavies it's easier to some extent because the FMC will tell you what speed to make on the approach. And if you autoland, you just set the MCP for that speed or slightly above (136 in a lightly loaded 747-400) and it comes out fine. The main trap with heavies is that you can't change your configuration at the last minute--you have to be aligned and stable in your approach quite a distance out, because last minute tweaks can be difficult and dangerous. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ID Please - Throttle Quad | Orval Fairbairn | Restoration | 0 | December 17th 05 08:35 PM |
Throttle movement | Max Richter | Naval Aviation | 12 | December 11th 04 11:09 PM |
Engine throttle | Bob Ingraham | Simulators | 13 | December 11th 04 07:17 PM |
Which throttle governer? | Garfiel | Rotorcraft | 1 | December 13th 03 04:30 PM |
Completing the Non-precision approach as a Visual Approach | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 45 | November 20th 03 05:20 AM |