![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It still surprises me that moving a lever to extend or retract gear makes an
aircraft complex. An autopilot or GPS is a lot more complex than a gear lever. Its called 'pilot workload'. In a real aircraft, you must: -Fly the Plane -Operate The Aircraft Systems -Keep track of your current location -Communicate with ATC -Keep Watch for Traffic -Plan your future track (or reference your flightplan), this includes making absolutely sure you remain clear of all restricted airspace. All in a reasonably loud, chaotic setting, with absolutely no option to 'pause'... Your sim covers 1 and 2 well... 3 and 6 ok (The various ways that simulators try and 'trick you up' navigation wise are very poor approximations of the real situations that come up... and restricted airspace is a non-issue). and 4 and 5 are jokes (pressing an 'acknowledge' button gives you absolutely no sense of how critical it is to keep constant track of ATC's dealings with the other aircraft around you... whose transmitters are 1960s vacuum tube technology and who all have different accents/ways of talking and traffic scanning on a monitor is nearly impossible)... So basically, in your little flight simulator, you are dealing with MAYBE half of the 'real-world' pilot workload... AND you have a pause when you get overwhelmed... Aircraft Systems (but not avionix) dictate an aircraft's complexity simply because those are the aspects of flying that the pilot cannot time-shift, cannot get away from, and who knows what else he'll need to be doing at the time. The complexity of an aircraft has nothing to do with its 'mean' level of pilot involvement, its the potential 'worse-case' level of pilot involvement (low on fuel, landing in the dark at an unknown towered airport, for example) that dictates it because there simply is no option for the pilot workload to exceed his capabilities at any point during the flight- the results would be fatal. Of course, you would know this if you had ever actually sat in a cockpit, instead of trying to tell us that we're incompetent because your little simulation (no matter how accurate it is at covering what it does) simply does not take into account the full range of experiences and requirements placed on a pilot... But I guess its my problem now because I'm bothering to respond. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ID Please - Throttle Quad | Orval Fairbairn | Restoration | 0 | December 17th 05 08:35 PM |
Throttle movement | Max Richter | Naval Aviation | 12 | December 11th 04 11:09 PM |
Engine throttle | Bob Ingraham | Simulators | 13 | December 11th 04 07:17 PM |
Which throttle governer? | Garfiel | Rotorcraft | 1 | December 13th 03 04:30 PM |
Completing the Non-precision approach as a Visual Approach | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 45 | November 20th 03 05:20 AM |