![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 10:00:07 -0700, Erik
wrote in : Larry Dighera wrote: On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 09:29:58 -0700, Erik wrote in : What's the safest way to do this? If you are _sure_ of remaining outside of Class D airspace, contact the tower and advise them that you will be conducting a photo-shoot at the coordinates of the location (expressed as distance from a VOR on a given radial). It would also be good to request Radar Traffic Advisory Service (flight following) from the appropriate approach control facility prior to alerting the tower controllers. Outside of Class A, B, and C airspace, you are the Pilot In Command (PIC) of your flight operations, and it would be inappropriate for you to request permission from ATC for the flight you describe. Thanks. You're welcome. And thank you for taking the vindictive to inform yourself before venturing forth. That's what I thought. Other's may have other good ideas too, like the excellent suggestion to take along an observer or two. A person to act as photographer or a second pilot would be even better. Try circling at low level over a ground feature out in uncongealed airspace, and simulate taking the photographs in a safer environment first. You'll be better prepared for the demands of scanning for traffic, controlling the aircraft, and finding time to frame and focus the camera all simultaneously. Calling the tower when I'm not entering their airspace seemed wierd to me. I understand what you mean, but using common sense to enhance flight safety in every way possible is the objective, the way I see it. There is a GPS in the aircraft I rent whenever I figure I'm going to do something in the proximity of airspace so that I know where I'm at positively. It might not be a bad idea to have plotted out the VOR radial and distance on the ground during your flight planning just in case there's a Solar Mass Ejection of something that renders the GPS inoperative. Plan for all the possible contingencies that you are able to foresee. That's what a reasonable and prudent airman does, anything less could be construed by the FAA as reckless and careless under FAR Part 91 Sec. 91.13: http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory...6?OpenDocument I thought calling the tower and telling them that some jackass will be flying circles just outside of their airspace was a good idea, too, I presume you are just being candid among fellow airmen, but in dealing with ATC and the public, I would always don the most professional demeanor of which I was capable. That means remaining dignified, knowing the pertinent regulations, and acting accordingly. In my opinion, factitiousness is inappropriate when lives are on the line; dignity and respect will serve better. I'm always afraid of sounding like a dumbs417 calling towers, though. I avoid it at every opportunity. That is unfortunate. Communication when it can reduce risk is a valuable tool. I suffered from "mike fright" too until I read Bob Gardener's book: http://www.amazon.com/Say-Again-Plea...dp/1560275731/ Say Again, Please: Guide to Radio Communications |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wichita Airspace Question and overlapping airspace | Owen[_4_] | Piloting | 1 | February 14th 07 09:35 PM |
Two airspace classes for one airspace? (KOQU) | John R | Piloting | 8 | June 30th 04 04:46 AM |
763 Cruising Speed. | [email protected] | General Aviation | 24 | February 9th 04 09:30 PM |
Cessna 150 Cruising | Anony Mouse | Owning | 3 | July 4th 03 02:27 AM |
Cessna 150 Cruising | Matthew P. Cummings | Owning | 1 | July 2nd 03 12:45 AM |