A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

VISUAL AIRCRAFT RECOGNITION



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12  
Old May 1st 07, 02:08 AM posted to rec.aviation.military,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
Tankfixer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 73
Default VISUAL AIRCRAFT RECOGNITION

In article ,
mumbled

"Tankfixer" wrote in message
ink.net...
In article ,

mumbled

"Tankfixer" wrote in message
nk.net...
In article ,

mumbled

"Yeff" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:07:54 -0700, Daryl Hunt wrote:

"Tankfixer" wrote in message
news
snip

While you are at it tell us again about the FB-4 nuclear

bombers of
the
1960's.

LOL, you have already been blown out of the water on that one.
Guess
you
are just recycling your old lies. Ask Ed if he ever was on a

Nuke
loaded
Phantom.

Yes, let's ask Ed. From Google

http://preview.tinyurl.com/2h5fw5
when
Ed
wrote the following:

The 401st TFW out of Torrejon conducted most of the rotational

support
for the Victor mission out of Incirlik, although over the years of

the
cold war there were a lot of tactical aircraft that sat alert with
nukes. Torrejon F-4s were originally E-models, but the wing

converted
to C's in '73 in a rearrangement of all the USAFE F-4s to

standardize
E's in Germany, D's in England and the C wing in Spain. I sat

Victor
in an F-4C, but never heard it referred to as an FB or BF.

He's already stated he has.

Yes, he's stated that he sat alert in an F-4C and never heard of

it
referred to as an FB-4.

But, again, don't let facts get in the way of you recycling your
lies.

He's recycling the very things you yourself have said.

Yes he is. And he's trying to hide the fact he's just a low level
troll.
Besides, I guess the Fighter/Bomber designation from MD says they
haven't a
clue to the own AC usage is supposed to be.

You mean the F-110A ?
Or the F-4C
Or the F-4D and E ? The F-4B being a USN aircraft

Fact is daryl when you start down this path folks might start to think
perhaps you never were in the USAF.

Actually, those folks that spent any time around the early days of the

jets
know better and know exactly what I am debating. What is clear is that

the
404thk00ks are infesting another


You mean like those who actually flew them ?
The one's who have not aggreed with you on your claim ?





I can see that you are coming to their aid since they are cornered

once
again. I thought you had given up on that. Well, you just got

demoted
back
to the dismal 404thk00ks. Nice job. You are now wide open for any

and
all
criticism that comes their way. Guess you will never learn.


Fact is daryl Yeff pulled up a quote from someone who was there and
actually flew the aircraft.
I'm sorry it does not agree with what passes for fact in your

universe.

The fact remains that everyone needs to take a look at a few military

ngs
that you and your other 404thk00ks have laid to waste. us.military.army
us.military.history alt.folklore.military us.military.national-guards,

and
a few more. All have been laid to waste. And there is no way of know

how
many Military Message Bases that you have helped to destroy or have the
404thk00ks locked out of. But it might be entertaining for others to

get a
gander at the aftermath.


I see in your haste to beat a retreat from a claim you try to obscure
things.
Fact is daryl, you were wrong.
How hard is it for you to admit that ?


Now you are claiming to be a Pilot back in those days? Sure, Sure. In
another life right?


Nope, not claiming to have been apilot at all.
That is your poor reading skills once again leading you down a garden
path of illusion.

A couple of folks in here, Ed Rasemus to note one have told you that you
are wrong.
I tend to defer to his word, he DID fly them.
If you have some beef with his account then take it up with Ed.
I'm sure he wouldn't mind spanking you, again.


Now, thank you for playing Bowling for Breadloaves. You can pick up your AK
at the door on your way out to bomb yet another Military NG. Go back to
Leturd.




--
Usenetsaurus n. an early pedantic internet mammal, who survived on a
diet of static text and
cascading "threads."
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
US aviation hero receives RP recognition [email protected] General Aviation 0 November 30th 06 01:14 AM
"Going for the Visual" O. Sami Saydjari Instrument Flight Rules 101 May 18th 04 05:08 AM
Face-recognition on UAV's Eric Moore Military Aviation 3 April 15th 04 03:18 PM
Visual Appr. Stuart King Instrument Flight Rules 15 September 17th 03 08:36 PM
Qn: Casein Glue recognition Vassilios Mazis Soaring 0 August 20th 03 10:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.