A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

interesting moment yesterday on final



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old May 6th 07, 01:50 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Margy Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 476
Default interesting moment yesterday on final

Matt Whiting wrote:
Margy Natalie wrote:

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

"Orval Fairbairn" wrote in message
news
An aircraft on final has the right-of-way, big jet or 150.


Not if he is 5 mile out!



Distance doesn't matter. If right-of-way is an issue the aircraft on
final
has the right-of-way.

It appears you interpret "right-of-way" to mean "the next aircraft to
land".
That's not what it means. Right-of-way rules come into play only if the
aircraft concerned would otherwise occupy the same piece of sky, or
nearly
so. If you're on downwind when another similar aircraft announces a
long
straight-in you should be well in front of him and right-of-way
shouldn't be
an issue. If it's a faster aircraft then right-of-way may well be an
issue
so you'll have to extend your downwind to follow him.



I prefer the overhead approach, so I can
determine the least disruptive arrival. You approach at pattern
altitude, down the runway, check for traffic on downwind and break to
the downwind. That way, you are not charging into traffic turning base
to final, while you are watching for the airspeed to diminish to drop
the gear, wait for "gear safe" and set up landing. IMHO, the
straight in
ranks among the "least preferred" of approaches.



There's nothing inherently wrong with a straight in approach, it is
often
the safest. The problem is many pilots that believe a full pattern
should
always be flown don't properly scan for traffic.

I don't have a problem with folks flying a straight in as long as they
do it well. I did have issue with the twin who's first announcement
was XXXX final abeam the Cessna when I was on my 2nd pattern of my
FIRST SOLO. I think he was low and in the ground clutter when I
looked up final. About 30 seconds after he announced I say him shoot
past me and well below. When I was a student the other thing that
bothered me a lot was the instrument guys coming in on straight in and
they were playing strictly by the books, but I had NO idea what Rikki
inbound meant. 5 miles out on a straight in would have made so much
more sense to me!

Margy



I was taught to make calls based on distance rather than approach fix
when practicing approaches in VMC at an uncontrolled airport for just
this reason.

Matt

You had a good instructor!

Margy
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Interesting experience yesterday Paul Folbrecht Instrument Flight Rules 5 January 2nd 06 10:55 PM
"Interesting" wind yesterday Jay Honeck Piloting 36 March 10th 05 04:36 PM
A Moment of Thanks. Peter Maus Rotorcraft 1 December 30th 04 08:39 PM
Looking For W&B Using Arm Instead of Moment John T Piloting 13 November 1st 03 08:19 PM
Permit me a moment, please, to say... Robert Perkins Piloting 14 October 31st 03 02:43 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.