![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Whiting wrote:
Margy Natalie wrote: Steven P. McNicoll wrote: "Orval Fairbairn" wrote in message news ![]() An aircraft on final has the right-of-way, big jet or 150. Not if he is 5 mile out! Distance doesn't matter. If right-of-way is an issue the aircraft on final has the right-of-way. It appears you interpret "right-of-way" to mean "the next aircraft to land". That's not what it means. Right-of-way rules come into play only if the aircraft concerned would otherwise occupy the same piece of sky, or nearly so. If you're on downwind when another similar aircraft announces a long straight-in you should be well in front of him and right-of-way shouldn't be an issue. If it's a faster aircraft then right-of-way may well be an issue so you'll have to extend your downwind to follow him. I prefer the overhead approach, so I can determine the least disruptive arrival. You approach at pattern altitude, down the runway, check for traffic on downwind and break to the downwind. That way, you are not charging into traffic turning base to final, while you are watching for the airspeed to diminish to drop the gear, wait for "gear safe" and set up landing. IMHO, the straight in ranks among the "least preferred" of approaches. There's nothing inherently wrong with a straight in approach, it is often the safest. The problem is many pilots that believe a full pattern should always be flown don't properly scan for traffic. I don't have a problem with folks flying a straight in as long as they do it well. I did have issue with the twin who's first announcement was XXXX final abeam the Cessna when I was on my 2nd pattern of my FIRST SOLO. I think he was low and in the ground clutter when I looked up final. About 30 seconds after he announced I say him shoot past me and well below. When I was a student the other thing that bothered me a lot was the instrument guys coming in on straight in and they were playing strictly by the books, but I had NO idea what Rikki inbound meant. 5 miles out on a straight in would have made so much more sense to me! Margy I was taught to make calls based on distance rather than approach fix when practicing approaches in VMC at an uncontrolled airport for just this reason. Matt You had a good instructor! Margy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Interesting experience yesterday | Paul Folbrecht | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | January 2nd 06 10:55 PM |
"Interesting" wind yesterday | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 36 | March 10th 05 04:36 PM |
A Moment of Thanks. | Peter Maus | Rotorcraft | 1 | December 30th 04 08:39 PM |
Looking For W&B Using Arm Instead of Moment | John T | Piloting | 13 | November 1st 03 08:19 PM |
Permit me a moment, please, to say... | Robert Perkins | Piloting | 14 | October 31st 03 02:43 PM |