![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 07 May 2007 20:41:13 GMT, "Jim Carter"
wrote: I think what you've cited is for bench testing during certification. Once installed in the aircraft then comparison against the pressure as recorded by the official weather observation is +/- 75'. An interesting discussion point came up recently that exposed the difference in teaching over the past 30 years. 30 years ago we were taught to set the altimeter to the known field elevation and record the difference between the official pressure and the indicated pressure, then apply that difference to every setting you received along your route of flight. Today they teach to set your altimeter to the official pressure and that's it. So my question becomes, when executing a precision approach to a minimum DH of 200' and then executing the missed procedure, the aircraft is allowed to descend slightly below the DH as things spool up. If you are already 75' lower than you think because of altimeter error, and you descend only 20' more (one gradient on the altimeter) aren't you really only 105' off the deck? I did cite the bench testing numbers, as they are the ones of which I am aware. I've heard of the 75' "allowance" for a field measurement, but I've not seen a regulatory justification for that value. As someone who flies instrument approaches to minimums, I, personally, would not be happy with a 75' error, and would have the system rechecked. So far as you being only 105' off the deck in your hypothetical instance, that is obviously the case. By the way, for Category II operations, which may have a DH as low as 100'AGL, it is a requirement to have readily available the altimeter calibration information from the last certification, (and to apply it appropriately). --ron |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Accuracy of GPS in Garmin 430/530 | Will | Instrument Flight Rules | 110 | May 29th 06 04:58 PM |
GPS accuracy | [email protected] | Soaring | 5 | January 18th 05 06:29 PM |
EGT Accuracy | O. Sami Saydjari | Owning | 6 | March 16th 04 10:53 PM |
ILS instrument accuracy? Help...... | TripFarmer | Instrument Flight Rules | 19 | September 22nd 03 08:26 PM |
gps altitude accuracy | Martin Gregorie | Soaring | 12 | July 18th 03 08:51 PM |