![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cubdriver wrote:
On 29 May 2007 04:52:23 -0700, Denny wrote: All these maneuvers are legal and appropriate training procedures.... Sure they are. And so is making a right turn after stop at a red light in most places --- but remember that the other guy has the right of way! That's the key, the way I read it. Traffic flying the full recommended pattern has the right of way of traffic not flying the full pattern. That includes those making base leg entries, straight into downwind entries, and straight in approaches (both visual and instrument, be it practice or actual). (All of that assumes the airport is above the VFR minimums. If it isn't, then IFR rules apply and "right of way" is theoretically a non-issue because ATC handle sequencing the departures and arrivals.) Basically, you can fly whatever you want, but only if it doesn't conflict with traffic established in the recommended pattern. That holds true any time you enter the pattern. Even when using the recommended 45 degree mid-field downwind entry, traffic already on the downwind (presumably from a take off staying in the pattern) has the right of way and it's your responsibility to time your entry so as not to interfere with existing traffic. So for a straight in approach, if there's no one in the pattern or you can make the approach without interfering with those who are, then go for it. If not, it's your responsibility to figure out how to sequence yourself into the traffic flow without causing a conflict. All of that said, flying a proper pattern doesn't give you the right to cut off someone flying a straight in approach. That's the gist of the FAA ruling someone posted elsewhe the guy was violated for intentionally cutting off aircraft making straight in approaches or really long downwinds. That's a no-no. Finally, there is no FAR one way or the other. Just the AC and the ASF publication. Bottom line: the traffic pattern is no place for a ****ing contest. Just be courteous to those around you and pay attention for those who aren't. -m -- ## Mark T. Dame ## CP-ASEL, AGI ## insert tail number here ## KHAO, KISZ "Many UNIX utilities have undocumented limitations..." -- Programming perl, Larry Wall and Randal L. Schwartz |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Interesting experience yesterday | Paul Folbrecht | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | January 2nd 06 10:55 PM |
"Interesting" wind yesterday | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 36 | March 10th 05 04:36 PM |
A Moment of Thanks. | Peter Maus | Rotorcraft | 1 | December 30th 04 08:39 PM |
Looking For W&B Using Arm Instead of Moment | John T | Piloting | 13 | November 1st 03 08:19 PM |
Permit me a moment, please, to say... | Robert Perkins | Piloting | 14 | October 31st 03 02:43 PM |