![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Mark T. Dame" wrote in message ... That's the key, the way I read it. Traffic flying the full recommended pattern has the right of way of traffic not flying the full pattern. That includes those making base leg entries, straight into downwind entries, and straight in approaches (both visual and instrument, be it practice or actual). (All of that assumes the airport is above the VFR minimums. If it isn't, then IFR rules apply and "right of way" is theoretically a non-issue because ATC handle sequencing the departures and arrivals.) The airport can be above VFR minimums but still require an instrument approach, imagine good visibility under a low overcast. What's an arriving IFR aircraft supposed to do if he's still in cloud at the circling MDA and there are VFR aircraft in the pattern? While I suppose that's possible, to be VFR, the ceiling at the airport should be at least a 1,000' (500' above the ground and 500' below the clouds). All the non-precision approaches I'm familiar with have an MDA lower than that. Finally, there is no FAR one way or the other. Just the AC and the ASF publication. Bottom line: the traffic pattern is no place for a ****ing contest. Just be courteous to those around you and pay attention for those who aren't. FAR 91.113(g) does not exist? Where the hell do you get your information? FAR 91.113(g) only says that the aircraft on final has the right of way. It doesn't say anything about the pattern. It also doesn't say anything about other aircraft having to wait for a guy on a ten mile final to land before they can. Look at it this way. If you are in a car at a stop sign at an intersection. The crossing street has no stop sign. Cars on the crossing street have the right of way over cars at the stop sign. If you see a car coming a half a mile away, you don't have to wait for him. If he's 100' away, you do. Right of way only comes into play for conflict resolution. If there is no conflict, there's no right of way decision to make. -m -- ## Mark T. Dame ## CP-ASEL, AGI ## insert tail number here ## KHAO, KISZ "A brute force solution that works is better than an elegant solution that doesn't work." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Interesting experience yesterday | Paul Folbrecht | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | January 2nd 06 10:55 PM |
"Interesting" wind yesterday | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 36 | March 10th 05 04:36 PM |
A Moment of Thanks. | Peter Maus | Rotorcraft | 1 | December 30th 04 08:39 PM |
Looking For W&B Using Arm Instead of Moment | John T | Piloting | 13 | November 1st 03 08:19 PM |
Permit me a moment, please, to say... | Robert Perkins | Piloting | 14 | October 31st 03 02:43 PM |