![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Longworth" wrote in message
ups.com... On Jul 10, 9:37 am, Tina wrote: It also seems you planned a nighttime arrivial with a known burned out landing light. Tina, My understanding is that landing night is not a requirement for non commerical flight ============== Sec. 91.205 & 91.507 Powered civil aircraft with standard category U.S. airworthiness certificates: Instrument and equipment requirements. ............................ (4) If the aircraft is operated for hire, one electric landing light. ============== During my training, my instructor had me landed with and without landing light at night. I actually found it was easier to land without landing light. Little mistakes have a way of compounding themselves. You may want to sit in a quiet place and think about your go - no go criteria for a while. The two best outcomes of all of this is you made a safe trip, and you have an opportunigy to make future trips safer. Although I generally agree with your statement. I find your comments to be somewhat condescending. I do not know Kobra personally but I have read quite a few of his postings. He is an experienced pilot who is always willing to share his experience be it good or bad for all of us, pilots, to learn. I don't think that he needs to be told 'to sit in a quiet place and think....' ! Hai Longworth I agree with Tina, at least about re-thinking the sequence of risky decisions that were made. The landing light was only one of those decisions. The failure to notice trim adjustments not being required while extending flaps, the failure to push the go-up lever and reconsider the approach, etc are all risky decisions. Tina was pointing out that this flight was a series of those events. It is ironic that the AOPAs Flight Safety Foundation program this year is focused on breaking the chain of events (bad decisions) that lead up to accidents. Kobra was skilled enough to force the final result, but he kept throwing away his safety options along the way. Things could have turned out much differently, and then we'd all be berating the press for its one-sided coverage of another mishap; but that's another thread... Most likely your instructor had you land without the landing light as a non-standard event that would be possible if the light burnt out while in flight. I seriously doubt that an instructor would encourage any student or pilot for that matter to intentionally depart for a flight after dark knowing the landing light was inop. I'm also willing to bet that most instructors teach students how to go-around in the event the landing doesn't look or feel right, which Kobra noted was the case here. Nothing about this chain of events should be construed to be normal practice. Tina is correct that we can all learn from this example of how events get strung together and can lead up to a very risky situation. -- Jim Carter Rogers, Arkansas |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
flaps | Kobra[_4_] | Piloting | 84 | July 16th 07 06:16 PM |
Flaps on take-off and landing | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 397 | September 22nd 06 09:02 AM |
Fowler flaps? | TJ400 | Home Built | 20 | May 19th 06 02:15 AM |
FLAPS | skysailor | Soaring | 36 | September 7th 05 05:28 AM |
FLAPS-Caution | Steve Leonard | Soaring | 0 | August 27th 05 04:10 AM |