![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
However it is done the one thing I agree on is that it needs to be
very simple so everyone understands it. I like JJ's plan and it is simlar to what was done at Region 8. IIRC it was something like 1 to 100 feet low = 5 point penalty 101 to 200 feet = 10 point penalty 201 to 300 feet = 15 point penalty 301 to 400 feet = 20 point penalty 401 to 500 feet = 25 point penalty etc. The plan has a lot going for it. 1. It is simple 2. it or variations of the penalty make it only a small penalty to finish a little low and a larger penalty to finish lower. 3. There is no racing in the finish cylinder. One you enter the cylinder you can concentrate on landing safely. 4. The penalty is not so severe that there is little incentive to scratch around low outside the cylinder since unless it is a reasonable thermal it will be more advantagous to take the penalty than to take a weak thermal. Brian CFIIG/ASEL. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WinScore Question | Ray Lovinggood | Soaring | 2 | June 5th 07 03:15 PM |
calculate last point of diversion | jaws | Piloting | 1 | July 5th 06 04:19 PM |
How to calculate TOC and TOD? | Andrea da lontano | Piloting | 3 | October 21st 04 09:24 PM |
Weight and Balance Formula, Can one calculate the envelope | Joe Wasik | Piloting | 12 | September 29th 04 08:15 AM |
Winscore source code now available | Guy Byars | Soaring | 0 | February 5th 04 10:43 AM |