![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 13:54 30 July 2007, Kirk.Stant wrote:
I think if you have a 'zero penalty' band pilots will tend to use it. I can't figure the difference between and 700' finish with a 200' band and a 500' finish. Andy, My point is that the current system encourages you (the racing pilot) to shave the 500' limit as close as you can, but at the risk of losing a lot if you miscalculate - or opt for a low altitude dash to a rushed landing to minimize your losses. Plus it encourages expensive gadgets/ software (as I now realize that my SN10 will show the info I need, for example - priced one lately?) and clock watching at the finish. Providing an 'altitude-neutral' band to finish in should remove the incentive to aim for the bottom, since there would no longer be a benefit to be gained, while the risk of losing a lot would be a strong incentive to aim for the top of the finish band. The band should be big enough to hit easily with a properly set regular altimeter (I think 200' would work) without being so big the adjustment for altitude becomes 'gameable'. Heck, how about adding one second for every 2 feet below the top - that works out to a 1.2 knot final climb - which wouldn't hurt you much if you were 20 ft low, but would still encourage not finishing 199 ft low (who wants to give away time, after all). The addition of 'no racing after the finish' (i.e. if below the bottom, the 'hard deck' in fighter speak, you get your finish and penalty right there and can forget about a straight in finish and concentrate on making a safe low altitude landing) would additionally discourage high risk finishes. I know, I know, enough whining, this is pretty much beat to death - time to start bashing 2-33s again... Cheers, Kirk I must be missing the point Kirk - if there is no penalty for finishing at the bottom of the 'neutral band' then I'd be inclined to shoot for the bottom of it to save time. With the 30 seconds per 100' penalty band my behavior changes - in that case I'd shoot for the top of the penalty band but wouldn't worry too much about a few feet of miscalculation or misjudgement. Are you thinking of my 'penalty band' when you say 'neutral band'? Maybe that's it. 9B |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WinScore Question | Ray Lovinggood | Soaring | 2 | June 5th 07 03:15 PM |
calculate last point of diversion | jaws | Piloting | 1 | July 5th 06 04:19 PM |
How to calculate TOC and TOD? | Andrea da lontano | Piloting | 3 | October 21st 04 09:24 PM |
Weight and Balance Formula, Can one calculate the envelope | Joe Wasik | Piloting | 12 | September 29th 04 08:15 AM |
Winscore source code now available | Guy Byars | Soaring | 0 | February 5th 04 10:43 AM |