![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Le Chaud Lapin wrote in
oups.com: On Oct 3, 10:34 am, wrote: On Oct 3, 8:15 am, Le Chaud Lapin wrote: Actually I did because every book I read about flying skimped on the subject. I'm going to hop over to MIT's OpenCourseWare later this week and download their most basic course on aero/astro. Benoulli's principle is toss around as if it were facecloth, but I'm getting the feeling that no one is really doing the physics. Lemme see: People have been building flying machines since the late 1800's, about 125 years now, and none of them have been interested enough in the phenomenon of lift to do the physics? How old are you, anyway? Many of the contributors here have been flying much longer than you have likely been alive and have studied this in detail, and some of them might even have doctorates in the subject. The subject of lift has been beaten to death on this forum and if you Googled it you'd find some good information. I want to be clear. I did not me to say "no one" is doing the physics. Obviously there are aero/astro scientists all over the world. What I mean to say is that there seems to be a lot of *pilots* who are using Bernoulli's principle somewhat carelessly, IMO. Some of these people are CFI's. Please don't ask me to name individuals, but I know with certainty that there are at least 2 living, breathing CFI's who do not understand where 29.92 Hg comes from, or does not understand it well enough to make it make sense to a student. The might have understood it at one point, but they don't now. I know because I asked them. My feelings about teaching is that if you are not very certain about something, you do more damage than talking about it. Of course, this leads to the conundrum of having to explain to a student why a plane stays in the air without providing erroneous information. If I were a CFI, I would simply say that the aerodynamics result in pressure below plane is sufficient to counteract pressure above planes for force of gravity. That's not enough either. you need to know how and why lift varies throughot the flight envelope, but after th ebook learning, it's mostly intuitive and the intuition comes from experience. Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How much lift do you need? | Dan Luke | Piloting | 3 | April 16th 07 02:46 PM |
Theories of lift | Avril Poisson | General Aviation | 3 | April 28th 06 07:20 AM |
what the heck is lift? | buttman | Piloting | 72 | September 16th 05 11:50 PM |
Lift Query | Avril Poisson | General Aviation | 8 | April 21st 05 07:50 PM |
thermal lift | ekantian | Soaring | 0 | October 5th 04 02:55 PM |