![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Exactly.
All those radios were designed long before GPS. They are noisy and will interfere with GPS. That's the reason King made the "A" series of the 155 and 165. They are designed to co-exist with GPS. Karl wrote in message ... If I understand the reply, noted below, then the intereference is a stronger signal than the satellites. You cannot fix the impossible! Either you increase the power of the satellites many miles away to make it stronger than the local interference or remove the local interference. As for the older equipment it was probably less sensitive or used different frequencies within the receiver. Sadly that's how electronics works. If you put the GPS antenna close to a source of interference it will pick it up. Interferece problems were often reported by viewers, of TV in UK, using indoor antennas. Whilst they may work it is more by luck. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Garmin 396 Reception Problems - Latest Observations | Mike Spera | Owning | 9 | November 26th 06 01:10 PM |
Garmin 396 Reception Problems - Again | Mike Spera | Owning | 7 | October 25th 06 12:20 AM |
GNS 430 reception problems | Kevin Clarke | Owning | 13 | September 9th 06 08:10 PM |
GPS Reception Problems with 396 | Dan | Piloting | 16 | August 5th 06 04:01 AM |
Cambridge 302 problems solved | Tuno | Soaring | 0 | July 8th 04 05:36 PM |