![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 4, 10:47 am, Le Chaud Lapin wrote:
I could probably explain VOR to a 10-year-old, without ever mentioning things like counters, angular frequency, anisotropic radiation, frequency bands, sub-carriers, convolution, etc....and my explanation would still be correct. I doubt it. The ten-year-old, and most flight students, have absolutely no frame of reference to understand any of this in any depth. I teach a College course on Aircraft Systems, and I have to keep things really simple so they can grasp a few basics. If you are an electrical engineer, and I've had a few in my classes, we can get more into the workings of the VOR, but we leave all the others yawning and wondering if this is going to be on the final exam. When we come to hydraulics, we talk about pressure, volume and area and relate that to what we experience as kids playing with a garden hose. The same analogy can be used to a limited extent when explaining Ohm's Law. But now I encounter kids who grew up in highrises and never squirted their sisters with a hose, so they have more difficulty. Too much information, not enough relationship to previous bases because there are none. You have no frame of reference yet. When you start getting into violent departure stalls, skidding-turn spins, accelerated stalls, spirals and the like, the sounds and forces start to make the textbook stuff real. Sure, Jeppesen isn't always right. I haven't found a textbook yet that doesn't have some glaring errors, and the one I use in the Systems class has at least four that I have to issue corrections on in the syllabus. And the writers of texts have found that they don't sell the books that go into thousands of pages of detail; the students have neither the inclination for it nor the time. They have careers in other fields. So the textbook authors keep it really simple in the hope that the student will be piqued enough to dig further on his own. Most don't. You an argue this as long as you want, like Mx, but it's all book-learnin' and when the ground starts to come up at you real quick it won't matter one bit. You WILL want to understand AOA and where you went wrong. Dan Flight Instructor Aircraft Maintenance Engineer |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How much lift do you need? | Dan Luke | Piloting | 3 | April 16th 07 02:46 PM |
Theories of lift | Avril Poisson | General Aviation | 3 | April 28th 06 07:20 AM |
what the heck is lift? | buttman | Piloting | 72 | September 16th 05 11:50 PM |
Lift Query | Avril Poisson | General Aviation | 8 | April 21st 05 07:50 PM |
thermal lift | ekantian | Soaring | 0 | October 5th 04 02:55 PM |