![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 26, 5:31 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
It's done all the time, but it doesn;t have to be at one end and it doesn't have to be a horn. It also doesn't have to be a 100% balance if the performance doesn't neccesitate it or if the stab or wing is rigid enough for flutter not to be an issue within the speed envelope. But for anythng that goes very fast, you have to have 100% balancing, which means it's statically balanced at the hinge line. Even more than 100% is needed in some common planes (e.g. the Bonanza). In this case a wing roll will be dampened automatically (I think) -I'd guess it makes the plane feel more docile, but perhaps you know this plane and can comment. But I disagree with you about one point, the center of lift of the control surface is still important. I think this is because the control linkages aren't stiff enough to stop a control surface flutter. (I am keeping to the question of control surface flutter and trying to avoid the coupling in of the flying surface the control is attached to.) I think you would agree that if the Cl of the surface were ahead of it's COG control surface flutter would be guaranteed (no linkages would be stiff enough to control it)? I believe that this mode may be excited by the disturbed air flowing through the gap between control surface and wing which slightly reduces the surface lift on one side which then couples into the potential for the flutter. It would be felt as a vibration in the stick whereas a wing flutter _might_ not be felt through the stick at all (esp. if the control surface is 100% balanced!!) Nice to have a bit of flying/tech discussion instead of troll lures. Cheers leads to . I'll agree that normally the Cl will be behind the COG for a typical triangular section control surface but if a dynamically balanced design is sought, the Cl moves much closer to the hinge line and then the COG may not be far enough forward. I'd suspect this might have been a big problem with some early WW1 type rudders that looked to be highly balanced. Cheers |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Can Washout Cause Flutter?? | DonMorrisey | Home Built | 12 | January 19th 07 02:32 AM |
WTD. SGS 2-33 Rudder | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | December 20th 06 04:31 AM |
Counterweighting to prevent flutter | [email protected] | Home Built | 11 | June 10th 05 03:51 AM |
rudder cable question | Bob Loer | Home Built | 7 | November 26th 03 08:34 AM |
Tail flutter! | I Can Computer Services | Home Built | 3 | November 24th 03 12:56 AM |