![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Marco Leon wrote:
Well, the difference with the Archer III I can see. The glass panel and different interior as well as other changes (like thicker glass) would seem likely to add a lot of weight. But If I were to pick up a '76 Archer that's pretty much original, I *should* see something in the ballpark of the "book" numbers. Those numbers (or something close) should make their way into the POH, right? Marco While the thicker glass should and the interior might increase the weight the glass panel ought to lower the weight. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Get a Load of This | [email protected] | Soaring | 4 | December 3rd 07 06:04 PM |
AOPA Sweeps Plane in Iowa City Today | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 4 | August 5th 07 10:38 PM |
New 182T, where's the useful load?? | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 10 | April 27th 06 06:48 PM |
What's your maximum G-load? | Happy Dog | Piloting | 13 | July 4th 05 03:46 PM |
Load supervisers | jfp | General Aviation | 0 | April 13th 04 04:22 PM |