![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 1, 3:23 pm, "Tim Mara" wrote:
I agree completely.....PCAS would be a good and very affordable option for glider pilots... allowing (or forcing the FAA's hand)into making transponders mandatory in gliders is going to be a real bump in the road for many (most) glider owners and clubs...many who don't need to fly down the approach corridor of international airports to get their kicks.. The other problem with transponders in gliders is the false sense of security it implies....to many it is "assumed" that this is like a shield keeping everyone else aware of their presents as they go happily flying along with their heads down looking at the wiz-bang flight computer...this leads to more near misses and occasional hits than electronics can avoid....I know of no Cherokee 140's or Cezna 172's flying with TCAS on board....and I also know of a lot more glider pilots who will insist they only turn on the transponder when they are flying down the glideslope of major airports.. Transponders are not the fix all for the problem, but mandatory transponders in k6's, 2-33's and 126's will certainly have an impact on the sport as we "knew" it. tim "Darryl Ramm" wrote in message ... On Apr 1, 11:57 am, "Tim Mara" wrote: the problem isn't gliders without transponders....the problem has always been flying where you shouldn't be .... I never went skin diving where they were chumming for sharks.... it's the same thing No the problem is when you really look at it there is much more traffic up there than we appreciate, and that is not just Reno but many other places. See and avoid does not work, see and estimate the traffic density does not really work either. People can underestimate the density and overestimate their safety and continue to believe they are doing a good job seeing and avoiding - pilots should try out a PCAS and it may surprise them how how much stuff they missed before. There are many places where you just can't go XC without significant exposure to GA, commercial and military traffic but many glider pilots are underestimating that traffic, live in a pilotage/VFR world, don't have a feel for traffic flow with approach/departure procedures, and without a transponder just do not fit into a radar managed traffic control system. Darryl Tim I do fly in high traffic density areas (with transponder and PCAS and talking to ATC when appropriate) and know many other pilots that also at least have a transponder in their ship and none that I know have this naive view of transponders and safety bubbles. If anything the fact that they have a transponder in their glider, tends to be correlated with an awareness of traffic, ATC, etc. and I suspect if anything these folks are more likely to have their heads outside the cockpit. And since many of those same pilots also fly with PCAS I can guarantee they understand the need to be looking outside. I know of many light aircraft flying with PCAS (Zaon) and a few (new expensive ones) with the Avidyne/Ryan system that is between PCAS and TCAS. Darryl |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
(USA) NTSB issues recommendations to the FAA and the SSA regardingtransponder use in gliders | Sarah Anderson[_2_] | Soaring | 6 | April 1st 08 12:51 PM |
go to NTSB.GOV | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | August 15th 05 08:34 PM |
FAA-NTSB | [email protected] | Piloting | 4 | January 25th 05 01:34 PM |
NTSB | EDR | Piloting | 22 | July 2nd 04 03:03 AM |
NTSB 830.5 & 830.15? | Mike Noel | Owning | 2 | July 8th 03 05:51 AM |