![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Schumann wrote:
...we should try to get all aircraft equipped with transponders. This is not sufficient, even if practical. ...negotiate an agreement to require transponders in all gliders in exchange for increased ATC separation of IFR traffic from glider targets and VFR access to higher altitudes. This is an argument we can win, that doesn't make us all look like a bunch of whiners. How much separation do you want? How likely are you to get _any_ more separation in a system which is already overburdened and has every expectation of becoming more so in terms of personnel, equipment, and airspace? The response of the US.gov to requests for more separation for gliders will be to restrict gliders and no one else. We already have wave windows. A raising of the national floor of Class A airspace is not in the cards. Jack |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
(USA) NTSB issues recommendations to the FAA and the SSA regardingtransponder use in gliders | Sarah Anderson[_2_] | Soaring | 6 | April 1st 08 12:51 PM |
go to NTSB.GOV | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | August 15th 05 08:34 PM |
FAA-NTSB | [email protected] | Piloting | 4 | January 25th 05 01:34 PM |
NTSB | EDR | Piloting | 22 | July 2nd 04 03:03 AM |
NTSB 830.5 & 830.15? | Mike Noel | Owning | 2 | July 8th 03 05:51 AM |