![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps wrote:
To make matters worser, I can't build one so I have to take someone else's work. ![]() the design. plus, you get to install a rotary-Wankel; this is good? How can a Wankel be good? Terrible fuel economy. A turbocharged rotary engine runs about 0.50- 0.55 Lbs/hp/hr BSFC A normally aspirated rotary engine runs about 0.45-0.50 lbs/hp/hr BSFC An air cooled lycoming runs 0.40-0.45 lbs/hp/hr BSFC when run LEAN OF PEAK. The rotary can use auto gas (including ethanol as an oxygenate) as well as the blue 100LL. The lycoming for the most part can only use 100LL, unless in experimental, or you can guarantee the mogas is alcohol free. The rotary is SLIGHTLY less fuel efficient than a normally aspirated lycoming engine when the lyc is tuned properly and run LOP. Being able to use car gas in a rotary obliterates any cost penalty on that marginal fuel economy issue. Cost per mile is cheaper in the rotary. And it can be rebuilt for less than the cost of ONE new lycoming jug, or replaced for the cost of 3 new jugs. Do the math yourself and you will see. Not so terrible now, is it? Dave |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Canard or Mooney | Linton Yarbrough | Piloting | 18 | May 21st 08 09:54 PM |
Aircraft ID? canard biz plane | Ron Hardin | General Aviation | 5 | October 1st 06 09:55 PM |
Canard Rotor/Wing | Eric Moore | Military Aviation | 0 | December 14th 03 04:39 AM |
Dumb Canard Question. | Russell Kent | Home Built | 39 | October 19th 03 03:25 PM |
Question - Regarding Canard Pushers... | Tilt | Home Built | 33 | August 10th 03 11:07 AM |