![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 18, 7:05*am, BB wrote:
Why am I so paranoid? No you are not paranoid John, just justifiably concerned. I have twice had the security fail issue with my 302. The first time I sent it back to Cambridge, the second time I just waited for the problem to go away. I still don't understand it and I know it will bite me again. So far the security issue hasn't cost me a flight but if I ever get back to Nationals flying I suppose it could. I did lose a Regional day though due to a utility date math error that prevent the log from being downloaded. There is a lot to be said for dissimilar redundancy. Andy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cambridge Model 20 Flight Recorder WANTED | N6TU | Soaring | 1 | May 28th 08 07:14 PM |
FSDO enforcement- GPS before effective date - which date to put in Aircraft Log for Part 43? | Ron A. | Instrument Flight Rules | 18 | March 15th 06 02:30 PM |
Date of effect now 1 October 2004 for revised IGC-approvals for certain legacy types of GNSS flight recorder | Ian Strachan | Soaring | 0 | March 15th 04 02:32 PM |
Date of effect now 1 April 2004 for revised IGC-approval for certain legacy types of GNSS flight recorder | Ian Strachan | Soaring | 56 | December 2nd 03 08:08 AM |
Cambridge 302 problem: "Could not get FAT.(A)" while trying to download flight logs | Jason Armistead | Soaring | 5 | July 13th 03 02:36 PM |