![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 21, 6:14*am, "Mike Schumann" mike-nos...@traditions-
nospam.com wrote: *If there is a legitimate concern that the VFR encoder is not accurate, the logical conclusion would be to make sure you have extra separation vertically between the IFR aircraft than you otherwise might. In a system where the transponder and encoder are separate units, the encoder to transponder altitude interface is typically implemented by multiple ground/open discretes. Something as simple as a dirty contact may result in a discrete being assumed open instead of ground state. A single bit error may result in an encoder reporting an altitude several thousands of feet in error. The Gilham Grey code used for altitude encoders has no parity check and, with few exceptions, no other means of error checking except correlation with the pilot's altitude report. One exception is transponders that display the reported altitude and allow the pilot to check it. Nevertheless the controller has no way to know the reported altitude is accurate unless verified against a pilot altitude report. In this context accurate does not mean plus/minus 200 feet (the resolution is only 100ft) but perhaps plus/minus 5000ft or more. Of course the same non error checked, low integrity, transponder/ encoder systems are the basis for TCAS conflict resolution. ref http://www.airsport-corp.com/dot_faa_ct-97_7.pdf "The results of this study indicate that most of the transponders carried by GA aircraft fail to meet all of the performance criteria specified in national standards documents, and that a number of these failures may be serious enough to significantly affect their performance with secondary surveillance radar systems and TCAS collision avoidance equipment. In addition, the data showed that performance failures on key transponder parameters were unrelated to the time that had elapsed since a transponder had received its last biennial inspection." Anyone ready for ADS-B yet. Andy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
(USA) NTSB issues recommendations to the FAA and the SSA regardingtransponder use in gliders | Sarah Anderson[_2_] | Soaring | 6 | April 1st 08 12:51 PM |
go to NTSB.GOV | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | August 15th 05 08:34 PM |
FAA-NTSB | [email protected] | Piloting | 4 | January 25th 05 01:34 PM |
NTSB | EDR | Piloting | 22 | July 2nd 04 03:03 AM |
NTSB 830.5 & 830.15? | Mike Noel | Owning | 2 | July 8th 03 05:51 AM |