If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Aeronca 11AC Chief Project FS
On Jul 7, 2:00 am, cavelamb himself wrote:
You are coming off pretty snotty, VB. Show and tell time. Let's see the airplanes you have designed and built... I'm holding up my end of an argument, against three or four people who are being equally snotty. I would be delighted to raise the level of this "discussion" up to a more genteel level, but it would require the same commitment from others... who immediately came after me with both barrels right out of the gate. As for show and tell, I did not and do not claim to be an aircraft designer. I've sketched on paper, and head-scratched, and dreamed just like everyone else on the homebuilt newsgroup. However if you read the thread from the start I went out of my way to not masquerade as a structural engineer, and to compliment Chris Heintz on actually being one. I will claim only this: 1. After having built and tested and crashed and succeeded and failed with hundreds of balsa model airplanes, and after having owned 15 or 16 full size aircraft, and after having gone through A&P mechanic school, and after having listened and learned from several people with engineering knowledge far greater than my own, and after having tinkered good and bad with small sheet metal projects on several airplanes... I have a little better understanding of what I am talking about on this thread than (let's say) half of the people here. 2. There are some people who probably have a lot more engineering knowledge than I, there are some with a lot less, and there are a few with engineering degrees that I definitely do not have. 3. I looked at a CH-601XL and found a fairly obvious problem. I pointed it out to an Aerospace engineer / A&P in our EAA chapter and he said there was too much movement there but there might not be any assymetrical loads on it. 4. There have been now SEVERAL 601XL in-flight wing failures, one or two new ones since I made the comment that started this flame-fest. If my big mouth keeps a couple of people from burying their heads in the sand on this issue, then perhaps there is some good being done. 5. Although I know damned well there are people on this newsgroup with engineering degrees and greater sheet metal knowledge than mine by far, for some reason they have NOT participated and NOT explained if I'm wrong and NOT explained if anyone else is right. 6. I own a CH-701 mini-project (plans and a few tail parts built), and I would love to build it and fly it. I am a very strong supporter of Chris Heintz' designs for the most part. He has done something brilliant, made the airplanes easy to build, and extremely simple. 7. But if Kelly Johnson can make a mistake, and Ed Heinemann, and Kurt Tank, and Willy Messerschmitt, and Andrei Tupolev, and Matty Laird, and Igor Sikorsky, and Bill Stout, and even CG Taylor can make a mistake, then so the hell can Chris Heintz make a mistake. It is my GUESS that he took the original 601 Zodiac and tried to make a sexy low drag wing for it, at the same time as he was fighting like hell to get it light enough for the new LSA category. He had to push too hard on some engineering issue (or more likely several small ones), he had to go to a lighter skin gauge or thinner shear webs or spread a load across too few bolts or something I do not have the college degree to understand ... and the strength of the airplane fell between what was good enough on paper and what the real world of ASSYMETRICAL flight loads or gusts or sub-par workmanship requires. 8. If I'm being snotty I apologize, but I will return fire when fired upon. And as you can see I will fully substantiate my arguments, unlike some others here ! From a highly experienced airport bum and highly NON-engineering- degreed mechanic, I am telling you all that there is an issue on the tail mounting of the Zenair design. I don't know if it is a big problem, a fatal accident waiting to happen, hugely overbuilt, or something that will wiggle but never break. That is a question for the engineers to clarify but someone needs to look at it. I'm saying that there is a tragic problem with the CH601XL airplane design. There are too many catastrophic structural failures that cannot be swept under the rug of builder error or amateur aerobatics. If it is a design flaw by Heintz, then he is still a great designer and deserves the same respect, but he will have to find the problem and issue a repair or upgrade. Bill Berle |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aeronca 11AC Chief Project FS | Victor Bravo | Home Built | 56 | August 10th 08 11:25 AM |