![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Denny wrote:
While the appeals court ruled in favor of aviation, their (usual) logic chopping just turns your stomach... It basically said that the NWEAA is not liable ONLY because the airplane crashed off the area of dirt that was under contract for the show... Had it rolled up into a ball near the exhibit tents or in the aircraft parking area it is likely that the court would have hit the NWEAA with the entire $10M judgment - after correctly excusing the EAA... I think if you review the records you will find that the court assigned the blame for Don Corbitt's crash to Don, a low time pilot. His death did not necessarily follow from his crash. It also never said that NWEAA is not liable "ONLY" because the airplane crashed outside of the area that NWEAA had leased. The Corbitt estate presented a logical argument supporting their view of NWEAA and EAA liability based on a series of propositions. The appellate court determined that more than one of the foundational propositions was incorrect. Why review the rest of the chain of logic? As far as the motivation for the suit goes, I am guessing that since Corbitt RETIRED from Microsoft in 1988 at the age of 37 and bought a plane he was one of many Microsoft millionaires and the widow was not just chasing the money. She was probably more motivated by outrage that her husband died horribly in full view of spectators and emergency personnel and if event coordinators had arranged for a properly trained and equipped crew to be there it might have turned out very differently. As far as our litigious society goes, I don't like it either, but it is not necessarily inherent in the system and I don't know that I believe the system is flawed. People abuse it. There are good lawyers out there ( probably the majority, if the many I know are any indication) and there are bad ones. The legal profession by its nature probably attracts more than its fair share of assholes, but it does not damn the whole profession. At the end of the day the lawyers represent clients that are not generally lawyers. So the problem is fueled by a contingent of ordinary citizens that chose to treat our incredible legal system like a slot machine. The problem is enabled by a host of defendants that try to abdicate their moral responsibilities and preserve their profits by hiding behind the ambiguities of law. Finally the whole system is greased by a jury of average citizens, which means six to twelve people that are willfully ignorant of about everything other than sports and the the latest American Idol contestants. It also doesn't help that lawyers seem to prefer their jurors that way -- if you want a quick exit from jury duty, just tell them you are an engineer or have an advanced degree. As far as the EAA and NWEAA goes, the flyin is the largest on the west coast and the third largest in the nation. Their own materials boast of fifty thousand visitors and hundreds of aircraft. This is not a low buck flyin. They have warbirds, homebuilts in attendance and even vintage aircraft offering rides. They evidently had a history of crashes at the event (not their fault, it happens...) Two fatal crashes that year in fact. With all of this, the emergency response consisted of a city fire truck manned by a predominately volunteer fire department who had no training and no special equipment for handling airplane crashes - basically a water truck for extinguishing a fuel fire. In Texas we have a lot of VFG's. My brother heads one up. I have immense respect for them, which is why it is disheartening when they are set up to fail. This wasn't some pancake breakfast, it was a multi-million dollar event and an actual crash isn't some statistical anomaly, but a reasonable expectation. I do love this press release though: "This year, the Arlington Fly-In drops Northwest Experimental Aircraft Association from its name for the first time in 20 years. The change is part of a new EAA agreement clarifying the national group’s role, said the event’s executive director, Barbara Tolbert. “The agreement offers the Arlington Fly-In a new, higher level of support from EAA,” she said. “We’ll be getting extensive promotion and coverage of the event from the EAA, which will be a major sponsor of educational forums and workshops.” Anyway, just my opinion, and my facts could be totally off base. Charles |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
reversed towbar | Jose | Piloting | 2 | January 6th 06 02:49 AM |
Chelton Lawsuit | [email protected] | Piloting | 2 | June 17th 05 04:26 PM |
Lawsuit in HPN accident | Steve S | Piloting | 55 | June 1st 05 11:38 AM |
Another frivolous lawsuit | Tony Cox | Piloting | 15 | June 22nd 04 12:01 PM |
Reversed ADF indications | DP | Piloting | 12 | November 10th 03 03:01 AM |