![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been paying attention to intersections a lot lately since I'm
looking at the IFR charts more. Check this example out; Dial up the MSLIN intersection on your New York section or skyvector.com. Looking at that; I've always interpreted that picture as the MSLIN intersection is at the intersection of V205 and V374, and I could use the associated radials defining those airways from the closest relevant VORs to know when I'm at that intersection. Upon closer examination, it appears to suggest that the intersection is actually defined off of the LGA VOR, but it doesn't give a clue as to which radial or DME off that VOR might define it. All of which appears to be wrong; look at it on the Enroute low-altitude chart, say L33. First of all, MSLIN is NOT at the intersection of V205 and V374. It is at the 5DME fix off the HUO 030 radial (off the V205 airway quite a bit -- quite different than the location implied by the VFR sectional). That other arrow on the IFR chart at MSLIN suggests I can locate the MSLIN intersection using the DME fix off of the CFB VORTAC (81 DME fix along V374 / R129). Now, CFB is an "L" VORTAC and normally would have a service volume of 40 miles, but I guess one has to pay attention to the rather high 10000 MEA on this airway in order to affix their MSLIN position using CFB. It prompted me to go back to the AIM Ch 1 service volumes -- it says that the L VORTAC does indeed have a service volume of only 40 miles, but that service volumes don't apply to charted IFR routes -- the MEA and route instruction on the chart supersede. So it appears that one would need to be above 10000 to use this airway in general and affix MSLIN in particular using CFB. I guess I learned a couple things today ![]() It does blow my mind though that the VFR sectional has a.) very misleading and incomplete information on how to locate the MSLIN intersection, and b.) oh yeah, didn't tell you that you needed to be 10000 or higher in order to fly V374 reliably using the VORTAC system.... I know I wouldn't pick up any quality signal from an 80nm distant VOR at 4,000 in that vicinity. Any other thoughts on what I'm interpreting? Tman... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Naming intersections/fixes | Airbus[_4_] | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | January 19th 08 04:09 PM |
Buying an incomplete project | JAX | Home Built | 22 | January 12th 08 04:10 AM |
Inaccurate Contest Scoring | Bill Feldbaumer | Soaring | 21 | June 14th 04 02:56 PM |
Altimeter inaccurate | smf | Instrument Flight Rules | 13 | May 8th 04 02:49 AM |
Inaccurate airspeed indicator | Wyatt Emmerich | Instrument Flight Rules | 20 | April 20th 04 12:08 AM |