A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Airway intersections on Sectionals -- info incomplete / inaccurate?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old November 25th 08, 01:41 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Tman[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 37
Default Airway intersections on Sectionals -- info incomplete / inaccurate?

I've been paying attention to intersections a lot lately since I'm
looking at the IFR charts more.

Check this example out; Dial up the MSLIN intersection on your New York
section or skyvector.com.

Looking at that; I've always interpreted that picture as the MSLIN
intersection is at the intersection of V205 and V374, and I could use
the associated radials defining those airways from the closest relevant
VORs to know when I'm at that intersection. Upon closer examination, it
appears to suggest that the intersection is actually defined off of the
LGA VOR, but it doesn't give a clue as to which radial or DME off that
VOR might define it.

All of which appears to be wrong; look at it on the Enroute low-altitude
chart, say L33. First of all, MSLIN is NOT at the intersection of V205
and V374. It is at the 5DME fix off the HUO 030 radial (off the V205
airway quite a bit -- quite different than the location implied by the
VFR sectional).

That other arrow on the IFR chart at MSLIN suggests I can locate the
MSLIN intersection using the DME fix off of the CFB VORTAC (81 DME fix
along V374 / R129). Now, CFB is an "L" VORTAC and normally would have a
service volume of 40 miles, but I guess one has to pay attention to the
rather high 10000 MEA on this airway in order to affix their MSLIN
position using CFB. It prompted me to go back to the AIM Ch 1
service volumes -- it says that the L VORTAC does indeed have a service
volume of only 40 miles, but that service volumes don't apply to charted
IFR routes -- the MEA and route instruction on the chart supersede. So
it appears that one would need to be above 10000 to use this airway in
general and affix MSLIN in particular using CFB.

I guess I learned a couple things today

It does blow my mind though that the VFR sectional has a.) very
misleading and incomplete information on how to locate the MSLIN
intersection, and b.) oh yeah, didn't tell you that you needed to be
10000 or higher in order to fly V374 reliably using the VORTAC
system.... I know I wouldn't pick up any quality signal from an 80nm
distant VOR at 4,000 in that vicinity.

Any other thoughts on what I'm interpreting?

Tman...
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Naming intersections/fixes Airbus[_4_] Instrument Flight Rules 6 January 19th 08 04:09 PM
Buying an incomplete project JAX Home Built 22 January 12th 08 04:10 AM
Inaccurate Contest Scoring Bill Feldbaumer Soaring 21 June 14th 04 02:56 PM
Altimeter inaccurate smf Instrument Flight Rules 13 May 8th 04 02:49 AM
Inaccurate airspeed indicator Wyatt Emmerich Instrument Flight Rules 20 April 20th 04 12:08 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.