![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Guys, I think we're all stressed from lack of flying and need to calm down a bit and stop over-analyzing this one. Yes, the point of the "front half" business is to further discourage starting out the back or back of the top and bumping gaggles along the top edge of the start cylinder. Yes, the area in which you get full credit for distance is described by a gentle semicircle defined by the first turn fix. Therefore, yes, you don't know exactly where the area is before you get to the first turnpoint. However, nothing terrible happens to you if you start outside of the "front half." No penalties, no invalid starts, nothing. You just don't get full credit for distance. In typical starts out the top, a half knot of extra thermal strength will be much more important than even being a mile outside of the extra credit area. Remember, people used to start out the top back when they got no credit at all for extra distance. Knowing the exact location of the "extra credit" area is just not that important. Thus, if you want to start out the top, the right strategy is to look for the best possible thermal in the front half to two thirds of the start cylinder. Programming semicircles into your flight computer and staring at that isn't going to do any good compared to looking for a good thermal. In these extreme situations such that you might be heading 30 degrees to the left or right of "courseline" into a huge first turn area, let me suggest that if you have no idea before start whether you're going to head 30 degrees to the left or 30 degrees to the right, you need to do some better pre-start thinking rather than worry about start geometry! Yes, this means that the very back of the start cylinder is disadvantaged for starts out the top. The RC is very worried about the "bump the gaggle" business, especially if the first leg is downwind. We judged that at least to start with the benefit outweighs the cost. In the future, we can remove or relax this rule if it is proving too constraining. Another possibility is to remove some of the "last valid start" language and let this simple rule alone police the "bump the gaggles" problem. But clearly if we see bump the gaggles behavior, or heaven forbid a crash, the whole start anywhere concept will be in danger. Hence, we thought it better to start conservatively. Let us know your experiences this year John Cochrane BB |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FAA publishes proposed changes to amateur-built rules. | Jim Logajan | Home Built | 19 | July 28th 08 08:30 AM |
2009 U.S. Contest Locations/Dates | Tim[_2_] | Soaring | 2 | February 28th 08 05:48 PM |
2008 Proposed US Competition Rules Changes | [email protected] | Soaring | 18 | December 31st 07 07:21 PM |
US Contest Rules Proposed Changes for 2006 | Ken Sorenson | Soaring | 18 | January 12th 06 04:30 PM |
Proposed 2005 Rules On SRA Site | Ken Kochanski (KK) | Soaring | 79 | January 27th 05 06:51 PM |