A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Strange 747/Pratt & Whitney project



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7  
Old January 17th 09, 09:20 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,130
Default Strange 747/Pratt & Whitney project

On Jan 17, 11:02*am, Ricky wrote:
On Jan 16, 12:23*pm, Tech Support wrote:



Ricky
A couple of WAGs.
1. Use PT-6 turbo prop to help take offs with max gross, hot day and
high altitude field.
2. Make normal 4 engine take off and at cruise altitude start PT-6
turbo prop and shut two engines down. This config would save a lot of
fuel and help bottom line.
3. New version of PT-6 and 747 airframe used as test bed. Qualify
another (bigger) engine for UAV use to carry heavier load.
4.Testing at high altitude for possible use on UAV .
Do you know the project or just fishing for possibilities )
Big John
************************************************** ******
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 01:22:29 -0800 (PST), Ricky
wrote:
We are installing a PT-6 on the top or on the nose of a 747! Can't
tell you where or what company.
Can you figure out why we would be doing such a thing?
Doesn't a 747 go much faster than anything running a PT-6?
We really don't know why this project is happening so I would
appreciate hearing your guesses.
Thanks,
Ricky- Hide quoted text -


The testbed sounds plausible since this 747 is being fitted with a
new, uncertified Pratt turbine engine for testing.

I do know the project as last night I was doing layout on one of the
doublers that wrap practically all the way around the plane aft of the
cockpit.

Ricky


But why would they use a airplane the size of a 747 to test a PT6?
Even a big PT6's power is tiny compared to the 747's thrust.

Dan
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PRATT & WHITNEY PROPOSES F-22A ENGINE VARIANT FOR LONG-RANGE STRIKE Mike[_7_] Naval Aviation 0 May 30th 07 02:44 PM
Was the Pratt & Whitney Double Wasp the best engine of WW II? Dave Kearton Aviation Photos 18 January 12th 07 07:20 PM
Question Pratt & Whitney Tool ... joseph Restoration 0 October 1st 05 02:57 PM
World War Two Era U.S. Radial Engines (Curtiss and Pratt&Whitney) Lincoln Brown Military Aviation 10 February 13th 04 04:30 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.